Abstract:For most of the time during the last two millennia, China was a dynastic empire ruled by an emperor with the assistance of a highly developed mandarinate of imperial organs. “Administrative law” in the modern sense of a set of legal norms enacted by the legislature or developed by the judiciary that simultaneously empower and constrain state organs and officials for the purpose of protecting the rights and liberties of subjects or citizens did not exist in traditional China. But there did exist for more than two millenniums elaborate and sophisticated rules regulating the powers and functions of each component of the highly complex and extensive machinery of imperial organs and officials, and prescribing in detail the duties of officials as well as the multiple and complicated monitoring, supervisory and disciplinary mechanisms applicable to the exercise of powers and performance of duties by officials in different state organs. By the late 19th century, Qing China’s increasing subordination to Western imperialism and semi-colonialism convinced significant numbers of Chinese political and scholarly elite that there was a desperate need for China to “save” and strengthen itself by pursuing modernization. In the legal and political domains, this generally meant extensive borrowing or transplant of Western political and legal institutions. After China's defeat by Japan in the Sino-Japanese War of 1894–1895, Japan’s experience of successful modernisation was widely admired by Chinese intellectuals, and the Japanese model was perceived as one that China should imitate in its self-strengthening efforts. This essay will therefore begin with the introduction and reception of Japanese administrative law in China in the late Qing Dynasty. It will then survey the study of comparative law and the influence of foreign law on the development of Chinese administrative law in the Republic of China era (1911–1949) and after the establishment of the People's Republic of China (1949-). Major developments in Chinese administrative law in both the Republican era and the Communist era will also be briefly outlined as the context of administrative law scholarship. It will be seen that the story of the study of comparative and foreign administrative law in modern China is very closely intertwined with the story of the development of Chinese administrative law itself.

The Acquisition And Use Of International Law By Chinese Diplomat As A Sword To Defend Sovereignty And Challenge Chinese Exclusion Act In The Late Qing Dynasty

THE EVOLUTION OF GUANXI DYNAMICS IN THE CHINESE LEGAL SYSTEM: A PERSPECTIVE OF CAREER MOBILITY

Politicised Legal Discourse And Judicial Accommodation Of Petitioners In Chinese Courts

China’s Law Diplomacy——Theory and Practice

A Network of Legal Transfer

Tracing Chinese Scholar Chen Tiqiang's Pursuit of International Law Education and His Major Contribution to the Doctrine of Recognition

The Final Splendour Of An Aged Empire: Chinese Thought On International Law In The Early Twentieth Century

The Origin and Early Development of Chinese Connections at the University of Pennsylvania Law School

The Chinese Tradition of Administrative Law

Pioneer Chinese Law Students in the United States from 1878 to 1911

Chinese international lawyer and British doctoral supervisor <i>The case of Hwang King Hung and Hersch Lauterpacht</i>

International Law in Chinese Courts During the Rise of China

The Rise of China and International Law

International Law in Chinese Courts

Roman Law in the Curriculum of the First Chinese Students in England, France, and China

A Forgotten Proponent of a League of Nations and His Contributions to International Law

China's First American-Style Law School Library and Its Librarian

The Roman Law Tradition and Its Future Development in China

Students Studying Law Abroad and Dissemination of Modern Western Legal Knowledge in China

Near, far, wherever you are: reflections on studying and teaching international law

Chinese international lawyer and British doctoral supervisor