Efficiencies Of Portable Biostage And Rcs High Flow In Measuring Airborne Bacteria And Fungi Concentrations

Zhen Shi-Qi,Yin Li-Hong,Yao Mao-Sheng,Zhang Hui-Li,Chen Lian-Sheng,Zhou Ming-Hao,Chen Xiao-Dong
2009-01-01
Abstract:The biological collection efficiencies of the portable BioStage and RCS High Flow were compared when measuring culturable bacteria and fungi concentrations at train station,: subway, hotel, airport and riverfront in Shanghai, China. The portable BioStage and the RCS High Flow were operated simultaneously at flow rates of 28.3 and 100 L/min, respectively, in the same environments for 5 min. Sampling was conducted three times independently within a 2-day time period including the sampling in the morning, afternoon:and evening. In addition, the total bacteria concentrations measured by each of the samplers under different sampling time were also quantified by,the quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Gel electrophoresis. was also used to analyze the amplified air samples. Results indicated that in general the portable BioStage reported higher culturable bacterial and fungal concentrations than the RCS High Flow. Paired t-tests indicated that the differences were statistically, significant in most cases. The concentration ratios between two samplers seemed influenced by the airborne culturable bacterial and fungal concentrations qPCR tests indicated that the efficiencies of the portable BioStage and RCS High Flow when collecting total bacteria depended on the sampling time and environments. Among other factors, the the particle bounce, sampling time, and desiccation have played major roles for the observed sampling differences between the samplers evaluated.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?