Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze the legal complications prevail towards the architecture of mutual policy design between trade and climate change regimes. The recent literature on this topic is mainly focused on commons and has significantly ignored the existing regulatory constraints between both the regimes. Therefore, in this study relevant WTO and environmental laws are critically examined in order to bring another side of literally work on trade‐climate policy framework. Moreover, the time factor, role of developing countries and two approaches are also discussed that are important constituents to be considered during ongoing climate change multilateral talks. Design/methodology/approach This paper has six parts in total. Part one comprises of “Introduction”, part two gives “Overview of relevant WTO and climate change regulations”, part three describes “Antithesis of WTO and climate change rules” and explains the differences that both regimes posses in the basics of their nature, part four enumerates that how to galvanize the anticipated disputes among both the regimes, part five is focused on the participation of developing countries and their possible reservations towards climate policy and, part six gives some concluding remarks. Findings This study found four major points of caution while architecting climate change policy. First, the climate change policy gives excuse to certain economies to protect their domestic industry, which is supposedly the violation of WTO rules. Second, the disputes arise at WTO platform from the climate friendly trade policies would be a new inconvincible challenge. Third, the GATT article XX (general exceptions) and agreement on subsidies and countervailing measures (ASCM) are still not clearly defined under climate change regime. Fourth, the position of least developed countries (LDCs), there is no action plan as these countries are the most affected due to possible stringent trade‐climate policies. Research limitations/implications This research posses potential policy implication for both governments and international organizations, and provides new direction to trade and climate change researchers. It opens the way to critically examine the legal issues addressed in this paper which subsequently help both trade climate change regimes to overcome such regulatory differences with mutual consensus. Practical implications As policy implication this study suggests that what has been achieved during last two decades over climate change issue, and how long would it take to achieve the reasonable targets? In‐fact, the past work has succeeded to address the climate change as the global issue and it needs to be solved jointly but there is still a long way to make potential progress in order to architect the comprehensive policy and designing of multilateral agreements. It needs more time to constitute a climate change regime free from individual countries' political and economical interests and consensus amongst all major countries and group. Originality/value Most the current literature only focuses common options between trade and climate change policy regimes and significantly ignores the potential legal constraints. In this regards, this study fills existing gap in trade and climate change policy constraints and gives another new direction for policy makers.

Trading a Livable World

Creating An Earth Atmospheric Trust

Impacts of climate change on economies, ecosystems, energy, environments, and human equity: A systems perspective

Power in a Future World

Gender Inequality in the Global Warming Era: The Disparate Impact of Climate Change on Female

To See or Forsee: Environment Regulation or Economic Interest

Global Justice, Natural Resources, and Climate Change

Women and Climate Change

Climate Change and Trade Policy: from Legal Complications to Time Factor

Westphalian Sovereignty and the Free-Rider Conundrum in the Atmospheric Commons: Examining Global Governance Regimes for Addressing Climate Change Adaptation

International Trade Law: A Driver of Climate Action or a Roadblock?

Climate politics in global Hobbesian Jungle

International environmental treaties: An honest or a misguided effort

Uncertainty in Climate Science and Climate Policy

The Climate Crisis and Export Intensity: A Comparative International Study of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Global South, 1990–2014

Trading Off Global Fuel Supply, CO2 Emissions and Sustainable Development

The Economic Geography of Global Warming

The Climate Casino: Risk, Uncertainty, and Economics for a Warming World

Green with envy? The effects of inequality and equity within and across social groups on greenhouse gas emissions, 1990–2020

Trade and the environment, trade policies and environmental policies—How do they interact?

The Wicked Problem Of Climate Change: A New Approach Based On Social Mess And Fragmentation