Cost Comparing Home-Based Rehabilitation With Hospital-Based Rehabilitation Following Total Joint Replacement: Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis

Ze-Yu Luo,Ting Zhang,Wei-Kun Meng,Duan Wang,Hui Pan,Zong-Ke Zhou
2017-01-01
Abstract:The purpose of this research is to evaluate the effects and cost of rehabilitation in or not in a hospital in total joint arthroplasty. The study included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effects or cost of home-based rehabilitation and hospital-based rehabilitation after total joint replacement. All related articles which were published up to June 2016 from Pubmed, Embaseand Web of Science were identified. Outcomes included pain, postoperativefunction, knee range of motion, 6-minutes-walking test (6-MWT) and cost. The quality of the included studies was assessed. Cochrane RevMan software version 5.3 was utilized to perform the meta-analysis. Seven RCTs that involved 820 patients were included in the meta-analysis, which were divided into two groups. The home-based rehabilitation group included 420 patients, and the hospital-based rehabilitation group included 400 patients. The meta-analysis showed that there were no differences for home-based rehabilitation compared with hospital-based rehabilitation in pain (WMD, -0.07; 95% CI, -0.17 to 0.16; P = 0.34), postoperative function (WMD, -0.11; 95% CI, -0.25 to -0.03; P = 0.12), range of motion (WMD, 0.37; 95% CI, -0.10 to 0.83; P = 0.12), 6-minutes-walking test (6-MWT) (WMD, -1.18; 95% CI, -3.19 to 0.83; P = 0.25). However, home-based rehabilitation could becost-benefit for the patients compared with hospital-based rehabilitation (SMD 0.42 (95% CI 0.04, 0.80)). In conclusion, home-based rehabilitation has superior to hospital-based rehabilitation in cost.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?