Comparison of Two Home Care Protocols for Total Joint Replacement

Frances M. Weaver,Susan L. Hughes,Orit Almagor,Richard Wixson,Larry Manheim,Bradley Fulton,Ruth Singer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51162.x
2003-04-01
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Abstract:OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of a more-efficient home care protocol to manage total joint replacement (TJR) patients after surgery.DESIGN: A randomized trial of two home care protocols for TJR management.SETTING: A hospital-affiliated home healthcare agency in a large midwestern city.PARTICIPANTS: Medicare-eligible individuals undergoing elective total hip or knee replacement surgery (N = 136).INTERVENTION: A home care protocol that included preoperative home visits by a nurse and a physical therapist and fewer postoperative visits (range of 9-12 visits) to the home than an existing protocol (range of 11-47 visits).MEASUREMENTS: Functional status, lower extremity functioning, health-related quality of life, satisfaction with care, and use and cost of healthcare services for 6 months postsurgery.RESULTS: There were no differences in functional status, health-related quality of life, or lower extremity functioning by group at 6 months. A marginally significant gain in satisfaction with access to care (P =.059) was found in the intervention group at 6 months. Home healthcare costs were 55% lower for the streamlined group (P <.001). Other costs did not differ significantly by group.CONCLUSION: TJR patients who received the more-efficient home care protocol experienced comparable outcomes to those who received the existing protocol. An abbreviated set of home care visits resulted in more-efficient delivery of care without compromising patient outcomes.
geriatrics & gerontology,gerontology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?