The Necessity Of Codification Of China'S Private International Law And Arguments For A Statute On The Application Of Laws As The Legislative Model

Chen Weizuo
2009-01-01
Tsinghua china law review
Abstract:Recently, the People's Republic of China embarked on the process of drafting a code of private international law (PIL) for the application of laws to legal relationships in civil and commercial matters involving foreign elements. The article provides historical context for the current discussion on PIL. The article then provides background on the current statutes and judicial opinions, which leads to the article's support for the necessity of codification of PIL.By examining the current legislative initiatives to adopt a PIL code, this article concludes that the Chinese legislature should and is most likely to use a code on the application of laws to legal relationships in civil and commercial matters involving foreign elements, which contains exclusively conflicts rules. The article uses the following arguments to support this conclusion: 1) Conflicts rules and rules on international jurisdiction have historically been governed by separate statutes in China. 2) The Chinese legislature has historically been unwilling to adopt a comprehensive code containing both conflicts rules and international procedural law rules. 3) China is a contracting party of a number of international conventions on international civil procedure including judicial mutual assistance. 4) The Chinese legislature treats PIL as an integral part of the future Chinese civil code, and they are unwilling to be rushed into drafting it all at one time. The author concludes that codification will provide greater legal certainty and predictability on the one hand, and necessary flexibility and adaptability on the other hand.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?