Abstract:The evaluation of perceived comfort inside a car during the early stages of the design process is still an open issue. Modern technologies like CAE (Computer Aided Engineering) and DHM (Digital Human Modeling) already offer several tools for a preventive evaluation of ergonomic parameters for car drivers using detailed CAD (Computer Aided Design) models of car interiors and by a MBS (multi-body-system) solver for evaluating movements and interactions. Such evaluations are, nonetheless, not sufficient because the subjectivity of comfort perception is due to factors that are very difficult to evaluate in the early stage of design. Physical prototypes are needed and these are often too expensive to be realized. In the last 30 years, several researchers have tried to develop methods to objectivize comfort performance but most of these methods are based on questionnaires, market research, or physiological and biomechanical analyses, and need devices or interactions that modify perceived comfort. Recently, the authors of this study developed a software tool named CaMAN® for postural comfort evaluations of upper limbs. The software employs a static analysis of human joints in a working environment (the car cockpit is assumed to be a working environment). Some software, like AnyBody™, allows evaluations of the muscular efforts made during body actions. In the literature, it is possible to find several papers such as Na et al. [26] and Telfer et al. [40] that demonstrate a correlation between muscular effort and perceived comfort. Empirical evidence suggests that better comfort is related to lower muscular activity. This paper shows the results obtained from numerical and experimental analyses using AnyBody™ and CaMAN®. Simulations of the static and dynamic behaviors of a car driver using a steering wheel are performed. The results show the differences between preventive analyses of perceived comfort that are made with and without an applied load for a subject in the fiftieth percentile. This paper shows the results obtained from numerical and experimental analyses using AnyBody™ and CaMAN®. Simulations of the static and dynamic behaviors of a car driver using a steering wheel are performed. The results show the differences between preventive analyses of perceived comfort that are made with and without an applied load for a subject in the fiftieth percentile.

An Ergonomic Design Method For Surface Mapped By Body Pressure Distribution Based On Subjective Comfort Rating

Ergonomics Simulation System for Sitting Comfort Measurement

Seat Surface Design Due to the Analysis of Body Pressure Test Data

Evaluating Sitting Comfort with Questionnaire and Body Pressure Distribution : Overview and Design

Comfort and pressure distribution in a human contour shaped aircraft seat (developed with 3D scans of the human body)

Pressure sensing of an aircraft passenger seat with lumbar control

Data Mapping Model of the Design of Human-Product Contacting Interface

The Ergonomics Simulation and Evaluation Architecture for the Automobile

Pose to Seat: Automated Design of Body-Supporting Surfaces

Optimization Study on the Comfort of Human-Seat Coupling System in the Cab of Construction Machinery

A Preventive Evaluation of Perceived Postural Comfort in Car-Cockpit Design: Differences between the Postural Approach and the Accurate Muscular Simulation under Different Load Conditions in the Case of Steering-Wheel Usage

A Computer-Aided Ergonomics Evaluation System for Customized Furniture Design

Designing an adjustable ergonomic laptop desk and its evaluating by RULA and NERPA methods

Modelling human seat contact interaction for vibration comfort

Optimal lumbar support prediction using intereface pressure

Evaluation and Prediction of Driver Comfort Using Body Pressure Sensors

Effects of seat parameters and sitters' anthropometric dimensions on seat profile and optimal compressed seat pan surface

An Objective Evaluation Method for the Comfort of Foam Cushion in Vehicle Seat

A Preliminary Study of Smart Seat Cushion Design

Measuring pressure distribution under the seat cushion and dividing the pressure map in six regions might be beneficial for comfort studies of aircraft seats

Human-Centered Design and Manufacturing of a Pressure-Profile-Based Pad for Better Car Seat Comfort