Heterogeneity Of Mgmt Gene Promoter Methylation And Protein Expression In Serial Specimens In Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

Qiang Pan,Xue-Jun Yang,Lin Zhu,Chun-Yu Song,Xing-Tao Diao,Yong Gao,Jun Zhu,Xiao Yue,Hu-Guang Li,Wei-Ling Cheng,Yi-Ping Ning
2016-01-01
Abstract:O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) is known as a predictive marker, which has been associated with longer survival in glioblastoma patients who were treated with alkylating agents. However, little is known about heterogeneity of MGMT gene promoter methylation and its protein expression across different regions within the same tumor. This study was aimed to compare the status of MGMT gene promoter methylation and protein expression in different sites' specimens of newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Two to four specimens were obtained from different regions in the same tumor during surgical procedure in 20 newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients guided by neuronavigation system(overall number of specimens: 60, all of which were prepared for the following analysis except one specimen showed necrotic obiviously). MGMT promoter profile was analyzed by Methylation-specific polymerase-Chain-reaction analysis (MSP). The MGMT protein expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and western blotting (WB). MGMT promoter Methylation was detected in 45.76% (27/59) specimens. IHC and WB analysis exhibited high concordant findings (r=0.93, P<0.001). There was no significant correlation between MGMT promoter methylation and protein expression (IHC and MSP, x(2)=3.18 P=0.074; WB and MSP, Z=-1.712 P=0.087), and this study also demonstrated the regional heterogeneity of MGMT status of methylation in 10.00% (2/20) patients and MGMT protein expression in 40.00% (8/20) patients. MGMT promoter methylation is probably not the only modulating factor in MGMT protein expression. Our research questions the guiding significance of MGMT promoter methylation or its protein expression to the therapeutic scheme, which detected only in a small piece of specimen in clinical practice.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?