Abstract:Background: Molecular profiles can predict which patients will respond to current standard treatment and new targeted therapy regimens. Using data from a highly diverse population of approximately three million in Southeast London and Kent, this study aims to evaluate the prevalence of IDH1 mutation and MGMT promoter methylation in the gliomas diagnosed in adult patients and to explore correlations with patients' demographic and clinicopathological characteristics. Methods: Anonymised data on 749 adult patients diagnosed with a glioma in 2015–2019 at King's College Hospital were extracted. Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for expressing IDH1 mutation and MGMT promoter methylation, based on each patient's age, sex, ethnicity, histology, tumour location and extent of resection. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate the overall survival functions. Results: A total of 19.5% of cases were IDH1-mutated. Being 39 years and younger (OR 5.48, 95% CI 3.17–9.47), from Asian/Asian British background (OR 3.68, 95% CI 1.05–12.97), having MGMT methylation (OR 15.92, 95% CI 7.30–34.75), an oligodendroglioma diagnosis (OR 7.45, 95% CI 2.90–19.13) and receiving a gross total/total microscopic resection (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.24–3.08) were each univariately correlated with IDH1 mutation. MGMT methylation association persisted on adjustment (OR 14.13, 95% CI 3.88–51.43). MGMT promoter methylation was seen in 54.3% of gliomas. In the univariate adjusted ORs, being younger than 39 years (OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.48–4.43), female (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.11–2.08), having IDH1 mutation (OR 15.92, 95% CI 7.30–34.75) and an oligodendroglioma diagnosis (OR 6.20, 95% CI 1.33–28.88) were associated with MGMT methylation. Being female (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.22–2.51) and having an IDH1 mutation (OR 15.54, 95% CI 4.73–51.05) persisted after adjustment for age, sex, ethnicity, histology, tumour location and extent of resection. IDH1 mutant and MGMT methylated gliomas were associated with frontal lobe location. Survival analysis showed that patients with both IDH1 mutation and MGMT methylation had significantly better survival than those with either molecular marker alone. Over a 3-year period, women with unmethylated MGMT promoters generally had better survival than men with unmethylated MGMT. Conclusion: This study showed that the molecular markers of IDH1 mutation and MGMT promoter methylation were associated with age, sex, Asian/Asian British ethnic group, tumour histology, anatomical location and extent of resection. This study has demonstrated the importance of assessing glioma molecular markers in the clinical setting and the need to stratify patients according to their clinicopathological characteristics.

Extent and prognostic value of MGMT promotor methylation in glioma WHO grade II

Prognostic and Predictive Impact of MGMT Promoter Methylation Status in High Risk Grade 2 Glioma

The Significance of MGMT Promoter Methylation Status in Diffuse Glioma

Does positive MGMT methylation outbalance the limitation of subtotal resection in glioblastoma IDH-wildtype patients?

Role of Concurrent Methylation Pattern of MGMT, TP53 and CDKN2A Genes in the Prognosis of High Grade Glioma

Association of IDH1 Mutation and MGMT Promoter Methylation with Clinicopathological Parameters in an Ethnically Diverse Population of Adults with Gliomas in England

Impact on prognosis of the regional distribution of MGMT methylation with respect to the CpG island methylator phenotype and age in glioma patients

MGMT promoter methylation in prognosis of patients with newly diagnosed IDH1 wildtype Glioblastoma

The Clinical Significance of O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase Promoter Methylation Status in Adult Patients With Glioblastoma: A Meta-analysis

Comprehensive Analysis of MGMT Promoter Methylation: Correlation with MGMT Expression and Clinical Response in GBM.

Identification of MGMT Promoter Methylation Sites Correlating with Gene Expression and IDH1 Mutation in Gliomas

Is the Prognostic Significance of O6-methylguanine- DNA Methyltransferase Promoter Methylation Equally Important in Glioblastomas of Patients from Different Continents? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

Clinical prognostic value of isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation, O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation, and 1p19q co-deletion in glioma patients

Promoter Methylation of Mgmt in Paired Primary and Recurrent Glioblastomas.

DISTRIBUTION AND IMAGING CHARACTERISTICS OF HIGH-GRADE GLIOMAS ACCORDING TO METHYLATION STATUS OF MGMT GENE PROMOTER

Mgmt Promoter Methylation Correlates With An Overall Survival Benefit In Chinese High-Grade Glioblastoma Patients Treated With Radiotherapy And Alkylating Agent-Based Chemotherapy: A Single-Institution Study

Heterogeneity Of Mgmt Gene Promoter Methylation And Protein Expression In Serial Specimens In Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

MGMT promoter methylation testing to predict overall survival in people with glioblastoma treated with temozolomide: a comprehensive meta-analysis based on a Cochrane Systematic Review

The Predictive but Not Prognostic Value of MGMT Promoter Methylation Status in Elderly Glioblastoma Patients: A Meta-Analysis

The Prognostic Value of MGMT Promoter Methylation in Glioblastoma Multiforme: a Meta-Analysis

O-6-Methylguanine-Dna Methyltransferase (Mgmt): Challenges And New Opportunities In Glioma Chemotherapy