Administrative Adjudication: A Systematic Push from Local Governments
YE Bi-feng,XU Jian,YU Qing-song
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13806/j.cnki.issn1008-7095.2012.02.007
2012-01-01
Abstract:The 16 effective administrative adjudication systems in the counting time are distributed mainly in three fields,which are natural resources and environment,intellectual property,and civil disputes.They are all created by the laws,administrative regulations and ministry rules of the central government.However,the sphere of administrative adjudication is gradually diminishing.Those created administrative adjudications are abolished one after the other,and new laws prefer to stipulate mediation or arbitration.Implementary rules of administrative adjudication mainly focus on adjudications involved in land,most of which are enacted by the local governments.The local governments not only make numerous implementary rules,but also specific ones.But in fields such as mineral rights,environment,intellectual property and civil disputes,the local governments do not play their part of detailing administrative adjudication systems stipulated by law,administrative regulations and ministry rules,let alone enact specific rules.Documents on administrative norms of administrative adjudication highly concentrate on land compensation,demolition compensation and woodland property.Among these adjudications,there are more documents on administrative norms concerning woodland property from the central government,and more documents on administrative norms concerning land compensation and demolition compensation from the local governments.The contents of these documents focus on disputes resolution instead of the adjudication system itself.In retrospection of the litigations invoked by administrative adjudication,the adjudication systems of land compensation,demolition compensation and woodland property are all in operation,while other types of adjudication systems are hardly in operation.Among these three domains,the adjudication of demolition compensation is exceedingly active,but the adjudication of land compensation is very inactive.The statistic coupling is that,when the local governments enact specific implementary rules,the administrative adjudication systems are in operation.Otherwise,they would have stagnated.The frequency of being applied for local documents of administrative norms as the authority of an administrative adjudication system is proportional to the activeness of the administrative adjudication.Undoubtedly,the justification or falsification of this conclusion is subject to another research.