Abstract:Earlier research studies on public-private partnership (PPP) indicated that an objective, reliable, and practical risk assessment model for PPP projects and an equitable risk allocation mechanism among different parties are crucial to the successful implementation of these PPP projects. However, actual empirical research works in this research area are limited. This paper reports the first stage of a research study, which aims to identify and assess the principal risks for the delivery of PPP projects in China and to address their proper risk allocation between the private and public sectors. An empirical questionnaire survey was designed to examine the relative importance of different risk factors and to analyze the allocation of risk factors to different parties in PPP projects. A total of 580 questionnaires were sent out, and a total of 105 valid responses were obtained for data analysis. The Mann-Whitney U test is employed to investigate whether significant difference in perception existed first between the private and public sectors and second between industrial practitioners and academics in China. The empirical findings show that the three most important risk factors for PPP projects in China are (1) government intervention; (2) government corruption; and (3) poor public decision-making processes. These findings reveal that the Chinese government intervention and corruption may be the major obstacles to the success of PPP projects in China. A major cause for these risks may be attributed to inefficient legislative and supervisory systems for PPP projects in China. After conducting the Mann-Whitney U test on the 105 survey respondents, the empirical findings indicate that the perceptions of all 34 risk factors in China between the private and public sectors were not significantly different. Similarly, there were no significant differences between academics and industrial practitioners except that the former perceived the problem of government corruption to be more severe than did the latter. For risk allocation, the empirical results indicate that the public and private sectors were in general consensus with most of the risks identified. The major risks that the public sector preferred to accept are within the systematic risk category, especially political, legal, and social risks. The private sector preferred to retain the principal risks within the specific project risk category, especially construction, operation, and relationship risks, in addition to economic risks within systematic risk category. The remaining risk, environment risk, is preferred to be shared between the two sectors. This research study enables international construction companies to better understand how risks should be assessed and allocated for PPP projects in China. It also assists in risk response planning and control for future PPP projects in China. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000049. (C) 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers.

The Positive Driving Factors For The Development Of Public Private Partnerships In China

Public–private Partnership As a Driver of Sustainable Development: Toward a Conceptual Framework of Sustainability-Oriented PPP

Investigating the Driving Factors of Public Participation in Public-Private Partnership (PPP) Projects—A Case Study of China

The Public Private Partnership In Expressway Construction

The implementation of Public-Private Partnership in China: A sustainable pathway?

Effect of promotion pressure and financial burden on investment in public–private partnership infrastructure projects in China

Performance Evaluation Of Public-Private Partnership In Infrastructure Development In China: An Overview

Understanding the Risks in China'S Ppp Projects: Ranking of Their Probability and Consequence

The Rise and Fall of Public–Private Partnerships in China: a Path-Dependent Approach

Factors Affecting Local Governments’ Public–Private Partnership Adoption in Urban China

An Empirical Study on Key Factors Influencing the Performance of Public-Private Partnerships(PPP) in Some Transitional Countries

The Public Sector Comparator And Restraining Factors In China

Assessing the Effectiveness of Public Private Partnership (PPP) Models in China: A Comparative Study

Evaluating Public-Private-Partnership Policy System in China Based on a Two-Layer Multi-Level Framework

The public-private partnerships in healthcare sector in China

Rhetoric and reality of public-private partnerships in China: A sustainable public procurement perspective

Applying Public-Private Partnership to Subway Construction in China: What is the Evidence?

Analysis of Political Risks and Opportunities in Public Private Partnerships (PPP) in China and Selected Asian Countries

Empirical Study of Risk Assessment and Allocation of Public-Private Partnership Projects in China

Introducing Public–private Partnerships for Metropolitan Subways in China: What is the Evidence?

Preferred Risk Allocation in China’s Public–private Partnership (PPP) Projects