Abstract:This document supplements the main paper. Firstly, comparisons with the state-of-the-art methods under three other criteria on BRATS2020 are reported in Table 1. Secondly, more comparisons with the state-of-the-art methods (i.e., HeMIS [3], U-HVED [2] and RobustSeg [1]) on BRATS2015 and BRATS2018 are reported in Table 2 and Table 3, respectively. Thirdly, more visual results of RFNet are illustrated in Fig. 1. Furthermore, more qualitative comparisons with the state-of-the-art are illustrated in Fig. 2. Fourthly, illustrations of probability maps of the combinations of different modalities are shown in Fig. 3. Fifthly, more examples of generated attention weights are illustrated in Fig. 4 and Fig. 5. Finally, Figure 6 illustrates the detailed architecture of the encoder and decoder in RFNet. Comparisons under other criteria on BRATS2020: Table 1 report the specificity, sensitivity and Hausdorff distance (95%) on BRATS2020. As shown in Table 1, our RFNet also outperforms the state-of-the-art in terms of the three criteria on BRATS2020. Comparisons on BRATS2015 and BRATS2018: Table 2 and Table 3 report the segmentation accuracy from all modal combinations on BRATS2015 and BRATS2018, respectively. As visible in Table 2 and Table 3, our RFNet is able to improve the accuracy for all the modal combinations significantly on the two datasets. This demonstrates the superiority of our method. Visualization of the predicted segmentation masks: As seen in Fig. 1, our RFNet is able to segment brain tumors in various combinations of modalities. Furthermore, we also compare our RFNet with three state-of-the-art methods qualitatively, as shown in Fig. 2. By comparing the predictions of our RFNet and other methods, we can see that our method predicts more accurate segmentation maps. Visualization of the estimated probability maps: As shown in Fig. 3, our RFNet is able to generate accurate probability maps from various combinations of image modalities. Thus, the probability maps significantly facilitate our region-aware fusion and improve the accuracy of Table 1. Comparisons under three testing criteria on BRATS2020. ’Com’, ’Cor’ and ’Enh’ denotes the whole tumor, the tumor core and the enhancing tumor. Methods specificity (%) ↑ sensitivity (%) ↑ Hausdorff95 (mm) ↓ Com Cor Enh Com Cor Enh Com Cor Enh HeMIS [14] 82.72 66.88 62.40 99.55 99.79 99.77 12.73 13.30 32.84 U-HVED [10] 81.73 68.16 64.09 99.60 99.78 99.78 13.13 16.01 32.69 RobustSeg [3] 88.52 75.70 72.22 99.48 99.78 99.77 18.37 21.34 33.98 Ours 89.42 80.91 73.65 99.60 99.81 99.81 7.88 8.80 25.85

RFNet: Region-aware Fusion Network for Incomplete Multi-modal Brain Tumor Segmentation

Supplementary material RFNet: Region-aware Fusion Network for Incomplete Multi-modal Brain Tumor Segmentation

Mmformer: Multimodal Medical Transformer for Incomplete Multimodal Learning of Brain Tumor Segmentation

RFTNet: Region–Attention Fusion Network Combined with Dual-Branch Vision Transformer for Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation

MFD-Net: Modality Fusion Diffractive Network for Segmentation of Multimodal Brain Tumor Image

Brain Tumor Segmentation in Multimodal MRI Via Pixel-Level and Feature-Level Image Fusion.

SF-Net: A Multi-Task Model for Brain Tumor Segmentation in Multimodal MRI via Image Fusion

Modality-level cross-connection and attentional feature fusion based deep neural network for multi-modal brain tumor segmentation

Feature fusion and latent feature learning guided brain tumor segmentation and missing modality recovery network

MSFR-Net: Multi-modality and single-modality feature recalibration network for brain tumor segmentation

Flexible Fusion Network for Multi-Modal Brain Tumor Segmentation.

Learning intra-inter-modality complementary for brain tumor segmentation

CMAF-Net: a cross-modal attention fusion-based deep neural network for incomplete multi-modal brain tumor segmentation

Adaptive Cross-Feature Fusion Network with Inconsistency Guidance for Multi-Modal Brain Tumor Segmentation.

SARFNet: Selective Layer and Axial Receptive Field Network for Multimodal Brain Tumor Segmentation

Multi-modal Brain Tumor Segmentation via Missing Modality Synthesis and Modality-level Attention Fusion

RMTF-Net: Residual Mix Transformer Fusion Net for 2D Brain Tumor Segmentation

DPAFNet: A Residual Dual-Path Attention-Fusion Convolutional Neural Network for Multimodal Brain Tumor Segmentation

Bilateral Cross-Modal Fusion Network for Multimodal Whole-Body Tumor Segmentation

A multi-modality fusion network based on attention mechanism for brain tumor segmentation

MM-BiFPN: Multi-Modality Fusion Network With Bi-FPN for MRI Brain Tumor Segmentation