Abstract:The rapid development of natural language processing (NLP) technologies has enabled the emergence of legal intelligence assistance systems, with legal charge prediction (LCP) being a critical technology. The automatic LCP aims to determine the final charges based on fact descriptions of criminal cases. LCP assists human judges in managing workloads and improving efficiency, provides accessible legal guidance for individuals, and supports enterprises in litigation financing and compliance monitoring. However, distinguishing between confusing charges in real-world judicial practice remains a significant challenge. Most exist works cannot effectively capture complex relationships and discern subtle differences in fact descriptions while ignoring the legal schematic knowledge. In order to improve confusing LCP performance, we propose a novel knowledge-aware model for legal charge prediction that leverages Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to capture complex relationships within criminal case descriptions. Specifically, the model constructs structural and semantic graphs from fact descriptions and integrates information from both through a dual-graph interaction process. A legal knowledge transformer generates key knowledge representations at schema and charge levels, while a knowledge matching network incorporates hierarchical charge knowledge into facts. Besides, we also propose two real-world datasets namely Criminal-All and Criminal-Confusing, containing 203 different charges and 86 confusing charges, respectively. To the best of our knowledge, these datasets are the first well-organized datasets for confusing LCP task. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed model outperforms baselines and significantly improves the distinction of confusing charges, providing valuable support for intelligent legal judgment systems.

ADAN: an Intelligent Approach Based on Attentive Neural Network and Relevant Law Articles for Charge Prediction.

Charge Prediction with Legal Attention

Learning to Predict Charges for Criminal Cases with Legal Basis

Knowledge-aware Method for Confusing Charge Prediction

Distinguish Confusing Law Articles for Legal Judgment Prediction

Few-Shot Charge Prediction with Discriminative Legal Attributes.

Learning to Predict Charges for Legal Judgment Via Self-Attentive Capsule Network.

Knowledge-Enriched Multi-Cross Attention Network for Legal Judgment Prediction

Knowledge-enhanced model with dual-graph interaction for confusing legal charge prediction

Creating Auxiliary Representations from Charge Definitions for Criminal Charge Prediction

Mulan: A Multiple Residual Article-Wise Attention Network for Legal Judgment Prediction

A Multi-Source Heterogeneous Knowledge Injected Prompt Learning Method for Legal Charge Prediction

Distinguish Confusion in Legal Judgment Prediction via Revised Relation Knowledge

From Graph to Word Bag: Introducing Domain Knowledge to Confusing Charge Prediction

SIM-GCN: similarity graph convolutional networks for charges prediction

MANN: A Multichannel Attentive Neural Network for Legal Judgment Prediction

Few-Shot Domain Adaptation for Charge Prediction on Unprofessional Descriptions

Legal Judgment Prediction via Heterogeneous Graphs and Knowledge of Law Articles

Charge Prediction for Multi-defendant Cases with Multi-scale Attention.

Do Charge Prediction Models Learn Legal Theory?