Abstract:Legal judgment prediction (LJP) is a significant task in legal intelligence, which aims to assist the judges and determine the judgment result based on the case's fact description. The judgment result consists of law articles, charge, and prison term. The law articles serve as the basis for the charge and the prison term, which can be divided into two types, named as charge-related law article and term-related law article, respectively. Recently, many methods have been proposed and made tremendous progress in LJP. However, the existing methods only focus on the prediction of the charge-related law articles, ignoring the term-related law articles (e.g., laws about lenient treatment), which limits the performance in the prison term prediction. In this paper, following the actual legal process, we expand the law article prediction as a multi-label classification task that includes both the charge-related law articles and term-related law articles and propose a novel multi-law aware LJP (ML-LJP) method to improve the performance of LJP. Given the case's fact description, firstly, the label (e.g., law article and charge) definitions in the Code of Law are used to transform the representation of the fact into several label-specific representations and make the prediction of the law articles and the charge. To distinguish the similar content of different label definitions, contrastive learning is conducted in the training. Then, a graph attention network (GAT) is applied to learn the interactions among the multiple law articles for the prediction of the prison term. Since numbers (e.g., amount of theft and weight of drugs) are important for LJP but often ignored by conventional encoders, we design a corresponding number representation method to locate and better represent these effective numbers. Extensive experiments on real-world dataset show that our method achieves the best results compared to the state-of-the-art models, especially in the task of prison term prediction where ML-LJP achieves a 10.07% relative improvement over the best baseline.

Charge Prediction with Legal Attention

Learning to Predict Charges for Criminal Cases with Legal Basis

Do Charge Prediction Models Learn Legal Theory?

Knowledge-aware Method for Confusing Charge Prediction

Few-Shot Charge Prediction with Discriminative Legal Attributes.

Learning to Predict Charges for Legal Judgment Via Self-Attentive Capsule Network.

Creating Auxiliary Representations from Charge Definitions for Criminal Charge Prediction

A Multi-Source Heterogeneous Knowledge Injected Prompt Learning Method for Legal Charge Prediction

Knowledge-Enriched Multi-Cross Attention Network for Legal Judgment Prediction

Knowledge-enhanced model with dual-graph interaction for confusing legal charge prediction

Charge Prediction for Multi-defendant Cases with Multi-scale Attention.

Distinguish Confusing Law Articles for Legal Judgment Prediction

SIM-GCN: similarity graph convolutional networks for charges prediction

From Graph to Word Bag: Introducing Domain Knowledge to Confusing Charge Prediction

Legal Judgment Prediction via Heterogeneous Graphs and Knowledge of Law Articles

Interpretable Charge Predictions for Criminal Cases: Learning to Generate Court Views from Fact Descriptions

Mulan: A Multiple Residual Article-Wise Attention Network for Legal Judgment Prediction

ML-LJP: Multi-Law Aware Legal Judgment Prediction

Contrastive Learning for Legal Judgment Prediction

NeurJudge: A Circumstance-aware Neural Framework for Legal Judgment Prediction.