Abstract:Background: In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the practical use of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) has been reported previously with both advantage and disadvantage. The application of artificial intelligent (AI) forces overwhelmingly development of medical industries, while the impact of AI on PSI efficiency remains unknown. Thus, this study aimed to assess the efficiency of Intelligent-PSI (i-PSI) in TKA, compared with the conventional instrumentation-TKA (CI). Methods: 102 late-stage OA patients who met inclusive criteria were recruited in this prospective randomized controlled trial and separated into two groups (i-PSI vs. CI). In both groups, an AI preoperative planning engine was applied for surgery decision making. In CI group, conventional instrumentation was applied for bony resection, while resection of i-PSI group was completed with i-PSI. A convolutional neural network was applied to automatically process computer tomography images and thus produced i-PSI. With the help of three-dimension printing, the workflow of production was largely simplified. AI-driven preoperative planning guided resection and alignment decisions. Resection measurement, perioperative radiography and perioperative clinical outcomes were analyzed to verify efficiency of i-PSI. Results: In resection outcomes, smaller deviation of lateral and medial distal femoral resection were found in i-PSI group than CI group (P = 0.032 and 0.035), while no difference was found in other resection planes. In radiography outcomes, postoperative coronal alignments of i-PSI group, including postoperative Hip-knee-ankle axis (HKA) (P = 0.025), postoperative HKA outliners (P = 0.042), Femoral coronal alignment (FCA) (P = 0.019) and Joint line convergence angle (JLCA) (P = 0.043) showed closer to neutral position than CI group. Moreover, Femoral sagittal alignment (FSA) of i-PSI group showed closer to neutral position than CI group(P = 0.005). No difference was found in other alignments. In clinical outcomes, i-PSI group seemed to cost more surgical time than CI group (P = 0.027), while others showed no differences between the two groups. Conclusion: Intelligent Patient-specific Instrumentation in TKA achieved simplified production flow than conventional PSI, while also showed more accurate resection, improved synthesis position and limb alignment than conventional instrumentation. Above all, this study proved that i-PSI being an applicable and promising tool in TKA.

[Research Progress on Comparison of the Application Effects Between Personal Specific Instrumentation and Computer-Assisted Navigation Surgery in Total Knee Arthroplasty].

[Effect of the Surgical Time and Coronalmechanical Alignment after Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Computer Navigation System, Traditionalor 3D Printing Patient-Specific Instruments].

[Comparison of Alignment and Operative Time Between Portable Accelerometer-Based Navigation Device and Computer Assisted Surgery in Total Knee Arthroplasty].

[Blood Loss in Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Computer-Assisted Navigation or 3D-Printed Patient-Specific Instruments].

Little clinical advantage of computer-assisted navigation over conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty at early follow-up.

Comparison of the Accuracy and Efficacy of Different Assistive Techniques in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Network Meta-Analysis.

[Comparison of Total Knee Arthroplasty with Computer Navigation Systems and Conventional Techniques].

Efficiency assessment of intelligent patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Computer navigation and total knee arthroplasty.

Patient-Specific or Conventional Instrumentations: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Comparison of patient-specific instruments with the computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis in a patient with femoral fracture malunion

Early Assessment of the Likely Cost-Effectiveness of a New Technology: A Markov Model with Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis of Computer-Assisted Total Knee Replacement

New Technology‐based Assistive Techniques in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Bayesian Network Meta‐analysis and Systematic Review

Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Results in Shorter Navigation Working Time With Similar Clinical Outcomes Compared to Computer-Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty

[Comparison of Alignment and Position of Prosthesis Between Portable Accelerometer-Based Navigation Device and Conventional Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty with Valgus Deformity].

Comparison of a Novel Handheld Accelerometer-Based Navigation System and Conventional Instrument for Performing Distal Femoral Resection in Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Effect of 3D Printed Patient-Specific Cutting Guide on Patellar Height and Joint Line Position in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Comparison of Tourniquet Application Only During Cementation and Long-Duration Tourniquet Application in Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Meta-Analysis

Comparison of Implant Placement Accuracy Between Manual, Robot-Assisted, Computer-Navigated, Augmented Reality Navigated, Patient-Specific Instrumentation, and Accelerometer Navigated Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Effects of Computer Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery on Blood Loss after Total Knee Replacement

Comparison of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis