Test–Retest Reliability of Pain Sensitivity Measures in Individuals with Shoulder Pain
Rani Othman,Abdulrahman Bajaber,Anas Alhabshi,Majed Albadi,Rawan Aldhabi,Muataz Almaddah,Abdullah Alqarni
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/jpr.s456551
IF: 2.8319
2024-05-25
Journal of Pain Research
Abstract:Rani Othman, Abdulrahman Mohammed Bajaber, Anas Mohammed Alhabshi, Majed Albadi, Rawan Aldhabi, Muataz Almaddah, Abdullah Alqarni Physical Therapy Department, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia Correspondence: Rani Othman, Email Background: Central sensitization (CS) has been proposed as a possible contributor to persistent shoulder pain. Measures of sensitivity, such as quantitative sensory tests (QSTs) and sensitivity to movements evoked pain (SMEP), have been increasingly used to investigate CS in a wide range of painful conditions. However, there is a lack of data on whether QST and SMEP are reliable among individuals with shoulder pain. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the intra-rater test–retest reliability of QST and SMEP in individuals with chronic shoulder pain. Materials and Methods: Forty-seven individuals with chronic shoulder pain were enrolled in the study. The QST measures, including pressure pain threshold (PPT) and mechanical temporal summation (MTS), were tested, and SMEP was measured with a lifting task. Relative and absolute reliability were analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC 3,1) and standard error of the measurement (SEM), respectively. Results: The results showed that the ICC coefficients for all sensitivity measures were moderate to good, ranging from 0.63 to 0.86. The SEM% for the QST measures at all sites ranged from 21.4% to 36%, with TS at the forearm demonstrating a high SEM% (greater than 30%). The SMEP measure also showed a high SEM% (46%). Conclusion: The results showed that the sensitivity measures had moderate to good reliability among individuals with shoulder pain. Acceptable limits of accuracy of measurements were demonstrated for TS and PPT measures, while SMEP demonstrated high error, highlighting the need for further refinement of this measure among these populations. Keywords: shoulder pain, quantitative sensory testing, sensitive to movement evoked pain, central sensitization, reliability Shoulder pain is the third most common musculoskeletal condition, with serious medical and socioeconomic consequences. 1,2 In the general population, the point prevalence of shoulder pain ranges from 6.9% to 26%, with a lifetime prevalence reaching 67%. 3,4 Almost half of patients with new episodes of shoulder pain continue to have pain after 6 months, and 40% continue to have pain after a year. 1,5 There is currently limited and contradictory evidence on the mechanisms underlying shoulder pain experience. 6,7 Central sensitization (CS) has been proposed as a possible contributor to persistent shoulder pain. 2,8,9 CS is defined as an amplification of neural signaling within the central nervous system that elicits pain hypersensitivity. 10 CS encompasses a number of abnormal spinal and supraspinal mechanisms that result in increased nociceptive processing and decreased descending nociceptive inhibitory function. 9 Quantitative sensory testing (QST) methods have been used as proxy measures for assessing CS. 11 Several studies reported localized and widespread mechanical hyperalgesia, increased local temporal summation (TS), and a reduction in conditioned pain modulation effect in patients with persistent shoulder pain when compared to healthy individuals. 12–14 The interpretation of QST results from research or clinical settings is predicated on the assumption that the measurements are stable and reliable. 15 The reliability of QST measures has been investigated, and the results show acceptable reliability in healthy individuals. 15 However, the reliability of some QST measures such as TS has not been investigated in individuals with shoulder pain. Sensitivity to movement-evoked pain (SMEP) is a novel and functional form of sensitivity assessment that measures construct similar to QST outcomes. 16 SMEP has been proposed as a useful method for assessing pain summation, a key feature of central sensitization. 16 Evidence shows increasing pain levels (ie, pain summation) over repeated movements of the painful body region in a subgroup of people with chronic musculoskeletal pain including shoulder pain. 14,17,18 Assessment of SMEP may provide insights into peripheral and central mechanisms contributing to persistent pain experiences. 19 Currently, there is a lack of data on whether SMEP is reliable among individuals with shoulder pain. None of the previous studies established the test–retest reliability of SMEP among individuals with shoulder pain. Establishing of the reliability of sensitivity measures, such as PPT, TS, and SMEP, would assist clinicians in identifying features of CS in individuals with -Abstract Truncated-
clinical neurology