[Analysis of Long-Term Efficacy and Influencing Factors of Subthalamic Nuclear Stimulation for Isolated Dystonia].

J M Li,N Li,J Wang,X Wang,M,C H Zheng,C Qiu,T Luo,X L Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20200505-01420
2021-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the long-term efficacy of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) in the treatment of isolated dystonia, and explore the factors influencing the results. Methods: The clinical data of 23 consecutive patients with isolated dystonia treated with STN-DBS in the Department of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Military Medical University from December 2004 to December 2014,were retrospectively analyzed. Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) was used to quantify the dystonia symptoms and signs. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to explore the influencing factors of the results. Results: The age of the 23 patients including 8 females and 15 males was 19(10, 27) years old. The follow-up time was 5-12 years, with an average of (8.1±1.8) years.Compared with the preoperative period, the BFMDRS movement score decreased by 30.1 [95% confidence interval (CI): 12.3-47.8)] points, 34.7 (95%CI: 17.0-52.4) points, 34.1 (95%CI: 16.4-51.8) points and 34.0 (95%CI: 16.3-51.7) points (all P<0.001) respectively at 1 year, 3 years, 5 years after surgery and the last follow-up, the average improvement rates were (56.0±20.2)%, (65.3±24.0)%, (64.4±25.1)% and (64.3±25.1)%;the disability score decreased by 6.9 (95%CI: 1.4-12.3)points, 8.7 (95%CI: 3.3-14.2)points, 9.0 (95%CI: 3.6-14.5)points, and 9.2 (95%CI: 3.7-14.7) points (all P<0.001), the average improvement rates were (42.9±17.1)%, (55.5±23.2)%, (57.8±24.8)% and (58.7±24.8)%. Patients with DYT1-positive dystonia had higher rates of improvement in movement and disability scores than patients with DYT1-negative, but there was no statistically significant difference. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that gender, age at onset, course of disease, preoperative movement or disability score had no linear relationship with long-term results (improvement rate of movement or disability score) (both P>0.05). Conclusions: STN-DBS is effective and long-lasting in the treatment of isolated dystonia, but no reliable predictor has been found.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?