Color outside the lines: rethinking Apgar scores for equity

Davlyn Tillman,Charleta Guillory,Jean L. Raphael

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-024-03701-7

IF: 3.953

2024-11-13

Pediatric Research

Abstract:Standard assessments and algorithms in Pediatrics are increasingly recognized as tools that have the potential to perpetuate racial and ethnic health inequities. The Apgar score is an assessment of an infant's physiologic condition after birth and response to initial resuscitation. 1 Components of the score include: heart rate, breathing, muscle tone, reflex response, and color, with each assigned a score of 0-2 at 1 and 5 min of life. The scoring system was developed in 1952 by anesthesiologist, Dr. Virginia Apgar, with the intention to provide a rapid evaluation of the need for resuscitation and increase survival of poorly scoring infants. 2 At present, the score is globally used in clinical practice and research. 3 Low scores may inform clinical decisions on the need for therapeutic intervention such as intensive care monitoring. Several score components are subjective, leading to interobserver variability. 1 The color assessment specifically assigns a score of 0 if blue or pale all over, 1 if blue in the extremities, and 2 if pink all over. Concerns have been raised in whether these descriptors appropriately reflect multiethnic variations in skin tone. 4,5 In the 1953 article proposing the score, Dr. Apgar herself states the color score "is by far the most unsatisfactory sign and caused the most discussion among the observers". 2 Recent literature has shown racial/ethnic score variations as Black infants often receive lower scores, notably in the appearance component, even when adjusted for known risk factors. 4,5 In this issue of Pediatric Research , the systematic review by Fair et al. contributes to existing evidence by exploring Apgar scores and cyanosis assessments among Black, Asian, and ethnic minority neonates. 3 Authors analyzed associations between subjective skin color examinations and objective measures of wellbeing. The largest studies in the review showed that, for the same low Apgar scores, Black infants had lower mortality rates than White infants. This is despite national data showing that Black infants have higher overall neonatal mortality. Black neonates were also more likely to receive a low Apgar score. Authors conclude that scoring differences according to ethnicity may provide the most likely explanation of better survival among Black infants with low Apgar scores, with further evaluation required. The review also found that visual detection of cyanosis was poor for all ethnicities, suggesting the need for objective assessments of newborn health. Included studies on pulse oximetry found that occult hypoxemia was more likely in Black neonates. These findings highlight the limitations of visual assessment of cyanosis in those with darker skin tones, as well as scoring inconsistencies in the Apgar appearance component.

pediatrics