Bone Bridge Fixation Has Superior Biomechanics on Posterior Knees to Bone Plug Fixation after Lateral Meniscal Allograft Transplantation – A Biomechanical Study Simulating Partial Weight-Bearing Conditions

Shurong Zhang,Hongyun Li,Hong Li,Yinghui Hua
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2021.08.007
2021-01-01
Abstract:Background: It remains unknown how biomechanics change in posterior lateral knee using different fixation techniques in lateral meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) during simulated toe-touch partial weight-bearing. This study aimed to compare the biomechanical effects on posterior knee between bridge and bone plug fixation in lateral MAT. Methods: Intact knee, bone bridge fixation, and bone plug fixation were tested with 500 N of axial load during knee flexion at 0 degrees, 30 degrees, and 60 degrees, which simulated toe-touch partial weight-bearing. Contact area and peak pressure were assessed on posterior knee and the shift of peak pressure position were measured. Results: On the posterior lateral compartment, the contact mechanics of bone bridge fixation were similar to those of the intact knee (all P -values > 0.05), but its peak pressure was higher than that of intact knee at 60 degrees (P = 0.002). For bone plug fixation, the contact area of the posterior lateral knee was significantly lower than those of intact knee and bone bridge fixation at 30 degrees and 60 degrees (all P -values < 0.05). The peak pressure of the posterior lateral knee was higher than that of the intact knee at all flexions and higher than that of bone bridge fixation at 30 degrees and 60 degrees (all P -values < 0.05). The peak pressure position of bone plug fixation shifted more laterally and posteriorly compared with intact knee and bone bridge fixation during knee flexion. Conclusion: Bone bridges could maintain posterior knee biomechanics better than bone plug fixation during knee bending during partial weight-bearing. (c) 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?