Timing for Outflow Ventricular Septal Defect, with or Without Aortic Insufficiency

Bing Jia,Qiqi Shi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.07.050
IF: 5.113
2022-01-01
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Abstract:Outflow ventricular septal defects (VSDs) are relatively complex ones due to their mass interventricular interaction. Giridhara and colleagues1Giridhara P. Poonia A. Sasikumar D. Krishnamoorthy K.M. Sivasubramonian S. Valaparambil A. Outflow ventricular septal defect with aortic regurgitation: optimal timing of surgery?.Ann Thorac Surg. 2022; 114: 873-880Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (5) Google Scholar did a retrospective study concerning the optimal surgery timing for patients with outflow VSD and aortic insufficiency (AI). This study revealed that residual immediate postoperative AI was the only risk factor that related to the progression of AI. What is more, they suggested that with a resource-limited setting, the onset of aortic regurgitation would be the timing for VSD closure. First, they did an excellent research focusing on the timing for outflow VSDs, and comparable clinical outcomes have been reached according to their results. To our knowledge, subaortic VSDs and doubly committed VSDs have the risk of AI. Subpulmonic VSDs include those located away from aortic valve, which could barely cause AI. The authors may consider using doubly committed VSDs only instead of subpulmonic VSDs to better study the relationship between VSDs and AI. Another interesting result is that the mean size of the VSD detected by echocardiogram was 6.32 mm and found to be 12.54 mm during surgery. We understand that part of the defect might be hindered by the prolapsed aortic valves. However, with nearly 100% underestimation, that reason cannot fully explain the errors, and we wonder whether the measurement of VSDs during an echocardiogram needs to be reevaluated. As the authors said, current recommendations advocate the closure of VSDs as soon as the diagnosis is made, regardless of AI or not. Even in patients with restricted VSDs, we would recommend surgery immediately, especially the doubly committed VSDs. The clinical result was excellent in this study, with no aortic valve replacement required. However, with mass intraventricular interaction, the risk of endocarditis, pulmonary hypertension, and congestive heart failure would also increase, and we wonder whether any patients were lost to follow-up preoperatively. The authors mentioned that cardiopulmonary bypass in young children might lead to adverse neurodevelopment issues. We would like to point out that neurodevelopmental disorder is not commonly seen in normal cardiopulmonary bypass, unless it is neonate surgery, and we do not suggest neonate surgery for VSDs either.2Liamlahi R. Latal B. Neurodevelopmental outcome of children with congenital heart disease.Handb Clin Neurol. 2019; 162: 329-345Crossref PubMed Scopus (30) Google Scholar,3Gaynor J.W. Stopp C. Wypij D. et al.Neurodevelopmental outcomes after cardiac surgery in infancy.Pediatrics. 2015; 135: 816-825Crossref PubMed Scopus (359) Google Scholar The authors are to be congratulated for their excellent work with the limited resource. Outflow Ventricular Septal Defect With Aortic Regurgitation: Optimal Timing of Surgery?The Annals of Thoracic SurgeryVol. 114Issue 3PreviewIdeal time of surgery still remains controversial in outflow ventricular septal defect (VSD) with aortic regurgitation (AR). We aimed to identify the prevalence and predictors of postoperative AR progression. Full-Text PDF Timing for Repair in Outflow Ventricular Septal Defect With Aortic InsufficiencyThe Annals of Thoracic SurgeryVol. 114Issue 3PreviewWe appreciate the insightful comments of Jia and Shi1 regarding our article on outflow ventricular septal defect (VSD).2 Although according to current understanding the doubly committed VSD is considered as a separate entity from the subpulmonic VSD, these were considered synonymous for a long time.2 In our study under the category of subpulmonic VSD we included both subpulmonic and doubly committed VSDs (according to an older classification because we enrolled patients who underwent surgery in 2006 onward). Full-Text PDF
What problem does this paper attempt to address?