Abstract:Journal of Endovascular Therapy, Ahead of Print. Introduction:The aim of this study is to present single-center outcomes in patients treated with in situ laser fenestration thoracic endovascular aortic repair (LFTEVAR) for various aortic arch pathologies and assess the impact of increasing experience.Methods:The STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement was followed. A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected single aortic center data was conducted, including baseline information and peri- and post-operative outcomes of consecutive patients managed with LFTEVAR for aortic arch pathologies. Patients were enrolled from April 1, 2017 to January 31, 2023. The cohort was dichotomized to compare early (2017-2019) and late experience (2020-2023). Primary outcomes were peri-operative mortality and cerebrovascular morbidity.Results:Thirty patients were included (63.3% males, mean age 69.8±9.6 years); 21.4% presented with aortic ruptures. Aortic aneurysm involving the aortic arch was the most frequent pathology (53.3%). Forty target vessels (TVs) were revascularized, including 19 left subclavian arteries (47.5%) and 17 left common carotid arteries (42.5%). Double fenestrations were performed in 10 patients. The proximal landing zone was Ishimaru zone 0 in 5 patients (16.7%) and zone 1 in 13 patients (43.3%). Technical success was 93%. No spinal cord ischemia was recorded, and 3 patients (10%) suffered a post-operative stroke, of which 1 was major (3.3%). The median follow-up was 12 months (range=1-48 months). Thirty-day and follow-up mortality rates were 13.5% and 15.3%, respectively. Target vessel instability was 10%, of which 3.8% required reintervention. There was no statistically significant difference in outcomes between the early and late experience groups.Conclusions:Laser fenestration thoracic endovascular aortic repair of the aortic arch performed in experienced aortic centers is associated with low early mortality and stroke rates. It is a safe and effective therapeutic option in patients considered unfit for open repair.Clinical ImpactCustom-made devices for arch pathologies requiring urgent repair are not an option because of manufacturing delays. Off-the-shelf devices with single branch arch prostheses, and outside IFU techniques such as parallel-grafts and surgeon-modified endografts have been proposed in this setting. Another off-the-shelf alternative is in situ laser fenestration thoracic endovascular repair (LFTEVAR), which addresses many limitations of the other off-the-shelf options. Our study reports the outcomes of 30 patients treated with LFTEVAR, showing that it is a viable therapeutic option in patients considered unfit for open repair acknowledging that sufficient experience with complex endovascular aortic repair is mandatory to achieve acceptable outcomes in these high-risk patients with challenging aortic anatomies.

The Effect of in Situ Laser Fenestration for Total Endovascular Arch Repair in Redo Aortic Dissection.

[Progress on in Situ Fenestration During Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair].

A Single Center Experience of in Situ Needle Fenestration of Supra-Aortic Branches During Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair.

In Situ Laser Fenestration Is a Feasible Method for Revascularization of Aortic Arch During Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair.

In situ fenestration to preserve supra-aortic branch during thoracic endovascular aortic repair

Endovascular repair combined with in situ fenestration for new-onset or residual arch dissection in patients underwent aortic replacement

Endovascular Repair Combine with In-situ Fenestration for New-Onset or Residual Arch Dissection in Patients Underwent Aortic Replacement

In Situ Laser Fenestration for Revascularization of Aortic Arch During Treatment for Iatrogenic Type A Aortic Dissection

Short-Term Outcomes of in Situ Fenestration in Total Endovascular Aortic Arch Treatment.

Endovascular Repair of Aortic Arch Intramural Hematoma and Penetrating Ulcers with 810 Nm in Situ Laser‐assisted Fenestration: Preliminary Results of a Single‐center

Endovascular Total Arch Repair Using In Situ Fenestration for Arch Aneurysm and Chronic Type A Dissection

In situ laser fenestration in aortic arches during thoracic endovascular aortic repair

Laser Fenestration in situ Combined With Thoracic Endovascular Repair: Report of 12 Cases

Early and Midterm Outcomes of Endovascular Aortic Arch Repair Using In Situ Laser Fenestration

Laser in situ fenestration with thoracic endovascular aortic repair in treatment of aortic dissection involving arch branches: short-term result and complications

TAA13. Treatment of Aortic Arch Diseases With Three Fenestrated Stent Grafts of In Situ Fenestration and Prefenestration

Three-Dimensional Printing to Guide the Application of Modified Prefenestrated Stent Grafts to Treat Aortic Arch Disease

Fenestrated endovascular repair for diseases involving the aortic arch

Endovascular Treatment for Aortic Arch Pathologies: Chimney, On-the-table Fenestration, and In-Situ Fenestration Techniques.

Hybrid Approach to Management of Complex Aortic Arch Pathologies: A Single-Center Experience in China

A Systematic Review of Contemporary Outcomes from Aortic Arch In Situ Laser Fenestration During Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair