Comparison of Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt to Lumboperitoneal Shunt in the Treatment of Idiopathic A Monocentric, Assessor-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial

Wenyao Cui,Tong Sun,Ke Wu,Chao You,Junwen Guan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000026691
IF: 1.6
2021-01-01
Medicine
Abstract:Background: Ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) and lumboperitoneal shunt (LPS) remain the mainstay of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (INPH). There are no randomized controlled trials completed to compare the efficacy of these 2 shunt techniques. Methods/design: We will conduct a monocentric, assessor-blinded, and randomized controlled trial titled "Comparison of Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt to Lumboperitoneal Shunt for the treatment of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: Phase I (COVLINPH-1)" trial and recruit patients at West China Hospital of Sichuan University since June 2021. And this trial is expected to end in December 2030. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned into LPS group and VPS group at ratio of 1:1 followed by evaluation before surgery, 1 month, 12 months, and 5 years after surgery. The primary outcome is the rate of shunt failure within 5 years. The secondary outcomes include modified Rankin Scale (mRS), INPH grading scale (INPHGS), mini-mental state examination (MMSE), and Evans index. We will calculate the rate of favorable outcome, which is defined as shunt success and an improvement of more than 1 point in the mRS at evaluation point. We will also analyze the complications throughout the study within 5 years after shunt insertion. Discussion: The results of this trial will provide state-of-the-art evidence on the treatment option for patients with INPH, and will also generate the discussion regarding this subject.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?