Are preoperative phase-contrast CSF flow parameters ideal for predicting the outcome of shunt surgery in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus?

Wen-Jie He,Xie-jun Zhang,Qi-Zhong Xu,Run-tao Bai,Jia-kuan Chen,Xi Zhou,Jun Xia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.959450
IF: 3.4
2022-09-27
Frontiers in Neurology
Abstract:Purpose Phase-contrast magnetic resonance (PC-MR) is widely used in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH), but its role in predicting prognosis remains controversial. To evaluate the effectiveness of preoperative PC-MR CSF flow measurement in predicting the clinical response to shunt surgery in patients with iNPH. Methods Forty-six patients with definite iNPH were included between January 2018 and January 2022. PC-MR was used to evaluate CSF peak velocity (PV), average velocity, aqueductal stroke volume (ASV), net ASV, and net flow. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS), iNPH grading scale (iNPHGS), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Timed 3-m Up and Go Test (TUG) were used for clinical assessment. The primary endpoint was the improvement in the mRS score 1 year after surgery, and the secondary endpoints were the iNPHGS, MMSE, and TUG scores at 1 year. Differences between shunt improvement and non-improvement groups, based on the clinical outcomes, were compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test, logistic regression models, and receiver operating characteristic curves. Correlations between CSF flow parameters and the baseline clinical outcomes were assessed using Spearman's correlation coefficient. Results No CSF parameters significantly differed between shunt improvement and non-improvement groups based on mRS and secondary outcomes. And all CSF parameters showed significant overlap in both shunt improvement and non-improvement groups based on mRS and secondary outcomes. Significant correlations between the mRS and iNPHGS scores, and PV, ASV, and net ASV were observed. Conclusion While some preoperative PC-MR CSF flow parameters reflected the symptom severity of iNPH to a certain extent, they alone might not be ideal markers of shunt responsiveness.
neurosciences,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?