Predicting Values of Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure Derived Parameters in Outcomes of Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt for Post-Traumatic Hydrocephalus

Zhang Chao,Gao Guoyi,Feng Junfeng,Mao Qing,Jiang Jiyao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-2346.2019.02.003
2019-01-01
Abstract:Objective To reveal the relationship between cerebrospinal fluid pressure (CSFP),regression of amplitude and pressure (RAP) and operative effect of ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt on communicating post-traumatic hydrocephalus.Methods The clinical data of 40 patients with communicating post-traumatic hydrocephalus undergoing VP shunt admitted to Department of Neurosurgical,Renji Hospital,Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine from August 2017 to April 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.The 40 patients were divided into the good prognosis group (1 to 3 degree,n =26) and the poor prognosis group (-2 to 0 degree,n =14) according to Salomon's system of shunt outcome for hydrocephalus at discharge.The cerebrospinal fluid pressure-related parameters were compared between the 2 groups and the relationship between parameters and the surgical effect of VP shunt was analyzed.Results Univariate analysis revealed,Patients in poor prognosis group tended to have lower mean CSFP (13.82 ± 4.40 mmmHg) and mean RAP [correlation coefficient (R) between AMP amplitude (A) and mean pressure (P),0.66 ±0.19] compared to good prognosis group which had mean CSFP (15.12 ±3.10 mmHg) and mean RAP (0.81 ±0.13) (both P≤0.001).CSFP dose of good prognosis group under threshold 10 mmHg (DCSFP10) was higher than that in poor prognosis group [median (inter-quartile range):84.12 (615.22) mmHg/h vs.34.72 (91.62) mmHg/h,P < 0.05).RAP dose of good prognosis group under threshold 0.60 (DRAP0.6) was higher than that in poor prognosis group (14.29 ± 6.33 h vs.4.01:±:2.01 h,P <0.05).It was suggested by multiple logistic regression that CSFP (OR =2.231,95% CI:1.264-3.943,P =O.025) and RAP (OR =19.092,95% CI:3.104-162.103,P =0.001) were two risk factors associated with poor outcome in operative effect of VP shunt.Conclusions CSFP and RAP are two risk factors associated with poor outcome in patients with communicating post-traumatic hydrocephalus undergoing VP shunt,Both CSFP dose and RAP dose could be used as predicting parameters for effect of post-traumatic hydrocephalus with VP shunt.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?