Abstract:Background: Surgical resection is the main treatment for pheochromocytoma (PHEO). Although open surgery (OS) has been shown to be safe and feasible, the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery (LS) for PHEO remain controversial due to the uncertain effects of pneumoperitoneum on haemodynamics and the complexity of the tumour itself. This study was performed to compare the treatment outcomes of OS with those of LS for patients with PHEO. Methods: A systematic search through November 11, 2019, was conducted. All studies comparing outcomes of LS and OS for PHEO were included according to eligibility criteria. This meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager Software, version 5.3, and STATA software, version 12.0. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Results: Fourteen studies involving 626 patients were included in this meta-analysis. LS was associated with lower rates of intraoperative haemodynamic instability (IHD) [odds ratio (OR) = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.37 to 1.00, P = 0.05], less intraoperative blood loss [weighted mean difference (WMD) = - 115.27 ml, 95% confidence interval (CI): - 128.54 to - 101.99, P < 0.00001], lower blood transfusion rates [OR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.52, P < 0.00001], earlier ambulation (WMD = - 1.57 d, 95% CI: - 1.97 to - 1.16, P < 0.00001) and food intake (WMD = - 0.98 d, 95% CI: - 1.36 to - 0.59, P < 0.00001), shorter drainage tube indwelling time (WMD = - 0.51 d, 95% CI: - 0.96 to - 0.07, P = 0.02) and postoperative stay (WMD = - 3.17 d, 95% CI: - 4.76 to - 1.58, P < 0.0001), and lower overall complication rates (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.88, P = 0.01). However, no significant differences in operative time, postoperative blood pressure control, rates of severe complications, postoperative hypotension or cardiovascular disease (CVD) were found between the two groups. Conclusions: LS is safe and effective for PHEO resection. Compared with OS, LS caused less IHD, providing an equal chance to cure hypertension while also yielding a faster and better postoperative recovery.

[Strategy of reoperation for pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma].

Surgical strategies of complicated pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas and literature review

The update strategy of the isolated caudate lobe resection:A report of 21 cases

Comparsion between laparoscopic and open resection in pheochromocytoma：a review of 58 cases

The Surgical and Peri-operative Treatment of Pheochromocytoma

Surgical Treatment of Malignant Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma: Retrospective Case Series

Progress in surgical approaches and outcomes of patients with pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma

Surgery for pheochromocytoma: A 20-year experience of a single institution

International multicentre review of perioperative management and outcome for catecholamine-producing tumours

Perioperative Management of Paraganglioma and Catecholamine-Induced Cardiomyopathy in Child– a Case Report and Review of the Literature

Analysis of reoperation for primary hyperparathyroidism (report of 11 cases)

Preoperative 3D Planning and Intraoperative Navigation in Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Complex Pheochromocytoma

Unplanned Reoperation after Resection of Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: Experience Based on a High-Volume Sarcoma Center

[The Strategy of Isolated Complete Resection of the Caudate Lobe of the Liver Through the Anterior Liver-Splitting Approach: a Report of 19 Cases].

Hemorrhage in Pheochromocytoma Surgery: Evaluation of Preoperative Risk Factors

Safety and feasibility of retroperitoneoscopic surgery for adrenal pheochromocytoma

Laparoscopic versus open surgery for pheochromocytoma: a meta-analysis

[Perioperative Anesthetic Management for the Excision of Phaeochromocytoma Complicated with Catecholamine Cardiomyopathy].

Intraoperative Diagnosis of Functional Retroperitoneal Multiple Paraganglioma: A Case Report.

Unplanned Perioperative Reoperation Following Pulmonary Resection in Lung Cancer Patients: A Report of a Single‐Center Experience

Nursing care during management of recurrent pheochromocytoma: A case study