Comparsion between laparoscopic and open resection in pheochromocytoma:a review of 58 cases

Yang Fu,Gutian Zhang,Yi Xiong,Yangang Wang,Changwei Ji,Xiaozhi Zhao,Linfeng Xu,Xiaogong Li,Weidong Gan,Hongqian Guo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2015.02.002
2015-01-01
Abstract:Objective We conducted a retrospective cohort study to determine whether laparoscopic resection of pheochromocytoma is a safe and effective therapy for the management of pheochromocytoma, compared with open resection. Methods We collected pertinent data on 58 patients underwent pheochromocytoma resections. Perioperative outcomes of 41 laparoscopic resections of pheochromocytoma were compared with 17 open resections. Results Time of postoperative stay was shorter in the laparoscopic group [(9±2) d vs (12±2) d, P<0.05)], and tumour size was smaller [(34±53) cm3 vs (197±397) cm3, P<0.05)]. The operation time was also shorter in laparoscopic group [(162±56) min vs (213±44) min, P<0.05)], the blood loss was less [(158±402) ml vs (1081±825) ml, P<0.05)]. There were no statistically significant differences in intraoperative hypertensive episodes, the need for antihypertensive and vasopressin agents between the two group. The number of blood transfusion and postoperative complications in laparoscopic group were 7 case and 1 case while there were 12 case and 4 case in open group. During the follow-up of 5 to 47 months, there were no tumor recurrences or metastasis. There were&nbsp;no perioperative mortalities in this series. Conclusions The laparoscopic removal of pheochromocytoma is safe and effective. And also can be used for ectopic pheochromocytoma.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?