Mental Workload Classification Based on Ignored Auditory Probes and Spatial Covariance

Shaohua Tang,Chuancai Liu,Qiankun Zhang,Heng Gu,Xiaoli Li,Zheng Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ac15e5
IF: 5.043
2021-01-01
Journal of Neural Engineering
Abstract:Objective.Estimation of mental workload (MWL) levels by electroencephalography (EEG)-based mental state monitoring systems has been widely explored. Using event-related potentials (ERPs), elicited by ignored auditory probes, minimizes intrusiveness and has shown high performance for estimating MWL level when tested in laboratory situations. However, when facing real-world applications, the characteristics of ERP waveforms, like latency and amplitude, are often affected by noise, which leads to a decrease in classification performance. One approach to mitigating this is using spatial covariance, which is less sensitive to latency and amplitude distortion. In this study, we used ignored auditory probes in a single-stimulus paradigm and tested Riemannian processed covariance-based features for MWL level estimation in a realistic flight-control task.Approach.We recorded EEG data with an eight-channel system from participants while they performed a simulated drone-control task and manipulated MWL levels (high and low) by task difficulty. We compared support vector machine classification performance based on frequency band power features versus features generated via the Riemannian log map operator from spatial covariance matrices. We also compared accuracy of using data segmented as auditory ERPs versus non-ERPs, for which data windows did not overlap with the ERPs.Main results.Classification accuracy of both types of features showed no significant difference between ERPs and non-ERPs. When we ignore auditory stimuli to perform continuous decoding, covariance-based features in the gamma band had area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.883, which was significantly higher than band power features (AUC = 0.749).Significance.This study demonstrates that Riemannian-processed covariance features are viable for MWL classification under a realistic experimental scenario.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?