Abstract:Statement of problem. Screening for temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) is important in research and clinical practice. The short-form Fonseca Anamnestic Index (SFAI) was recently introduced but had only been validated for muscle disorders.Purpose. The purpose of this clinical study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the SFAI and its discrete and pooled items in relation to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) benchmark.Material and methods. A total of 866 consecutive participants with TMDs and 57 TMD-free controls (aged >18 years) were recruited. The participants (n=923; mean age 32.8 +/- 13.3 years; women 79.2%) answered the FAI, and TMD diagnoses were derived based on the DC/TMD protocol and algorithms. The 5-item SFAI, which comprised 2 pain-related and 3 function-related TMD questions, was subsequently acquired and assessed with reference to the DC/TMD diagnoses. The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) was used to verify accuracy (area under the curve [AUC]) and the best cutoff points. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios were also examined.Results. Pain-related (PT) and intra-articular (IT) TMDs were present in 48.3% (446/923) and 82.7% (763/923) of the participants, respectively. The SFAI demonstrated high accuracy for identifying all TMDs, PT, and IT (AUC of 0.97, 0.99, and 0.97, respectively). The best cutoff points were 12.5 for all TMDs/IT and 17.5 for PT. Sensitivity of the SFAI ranged from 90.7% to 97.5% while specificity varied from 93.0% to 96.5%, with the highest values for PT. As positive predictive values (99.4% to 99.5%) were greater than negative ones (41.7% to 83.3%), the SFAI was better at detecting the presence than the absence of TMDs. With reference to PT, the sensitivity, and specificity of the 2 discrete and pooled pain-related questions (questions 3 and 4), extended from 82.3% to 99.3% and 77.2% to 96.5% respectively. With regard to IT diagnoses, sensitivity and specificity ranged from 56.0% to 98.3% and 86.0% to 98.3% for the 3 discrete and pooled function-related items (questions 1, 2, and 5).Conclusions. The SFAI presented high degrees of diagnostic accuracy in relation to the DC/TMD and can be used for screening TMDs. SFAI scores between 15 and 50 points should be used to identify the presence of TMDs, with scores >20 points specifying possible pain-related TMDs. (J Prosthet Dent 2022;128:977-83)

Accuracy of the Fonseca Anamnestic Index for Identifying Pain-Related And/or Intra-Articular Temporomandibular Disorders

Diagnostic Accuracy of the Short-Form Fonseca Anamnestic Index in Relation to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders.

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Fonseca anamnestic index for temporomandibular disorders

Viability of the quintessential 5 temporomandibular disorder symptoms as a TMD screener

Study on the use of temporomandibular joint dysfunction index in temporomandibular disorders.

The "5Ts" screening tool: Enhancements and threshold values for effective TMD identification

Development and Validation of the Epidemiological Diagnostic Instrument for Temporomandibular Disorders

Plain Film Arthrography Applied to the Diagnosis of Intra-Articular Adhesions of the Temporomandibular Joint

Temporomandibular Disorder Severity and Diagnostic Groups: Their Associations with Sleep Quality and Impairments

Comparison of Psychological States and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients with Differing Severity of Temporomandibular Disorders

Validation of the 2011 and 2016 American college of rheumatology diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia in a Chinese population

The Potential of Percent Agreement as an Adjunctive Diagnostic Tool for Acute Temporomandibular Disorder

Validation of a Chinese Version of the Jaw Functional Limitation Scale in Relation to the Diagnostic Subgroup of Temporomandibular Disorders

Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) for children and adolescents: An international Delphi study—Part 1‐Development of Axis I

Characteristics of painful temporomandibular disorders and their influence on jaw functional limitation and oral health‐related quality of life

Fibromyalgia diagnostic model derived from combination of American College of Rheumatology 1990 and 2011 criteria

Fonseca's Questionnaire Is a Useful Tool for Carrying Out the Initial Evaluation of Temporomandibular Disorders in Dental Students

Central sensitization inventory is associated with psychological functioning but not with psychophysical assessment of pain amplification

Sleep Disturbance and Psychologic Distress: Prevalence and Risk Indicators for Temporomandibular Disorders in a Chinese Population.

Reliability and Validity of the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders Axis I in Clinical and Research Settings: A Critical Appraisal

[Magnetic Resonance Arthrography for the Diagnosis of Intraarticular Adhesions of TMJ Adhesions].