Abstract:Cognitive control refers to two critical processes: signal monitoring and inhibitory control. Before executing inhibitory control, the individual first monitors the signal of conflict or warning. However, whether the reward influences signal monitoring or inhibitory control remains poorly understood. In addition, some literature employed pretask reward cueing to study the effect of reward, but the role of pretask reward cueing on cognitive control was influenced by response strategies rather than stimulus processing. To address the above issues, the present study designed three novel variants of the classical stop signal task that combined the reward with certain stimuli or stimulus features and held stimulus-processing demands constant while varying attention demands. For experiment 1, participants tried to cancel responses on trials that were interrupted by the infrequent triangle but not to slow the initiation of the response. The results indicated that the SSRTs could be further accelerated if successful response inhibition were rewarded. Experiment 2 involved separation of signal monitoring from the stop signal task. Participants responded by pressing the left or right button when the trials were interrupted by the infrequent triangle. The results showed that participants could monitor a signal faster when the signal was associated with reward and conflicted with current behavior tendencies. Accordingly, we considered that the individual could more quickly activate behavior in correspondence with the signal and control the conflict because the signal monitoring was enhanced by reward, which indicated that the process needs more attention. Experiment 3 is the same as the second experiment, except that when trials were interrupted by an inverse triangle, participants made a dual button press. We found that the reaction time of the reward-related signal was shorter than that of the reward-unrelated signal in Go trials, even though the processing of the stop signal depletes the attention resource. These findings indicate that the reward-related signal captures more attention and enhances signal monitoring. In summary, these findings show that the reward-related signal captures more attention than bias for the enhancement of signal monitoring, thereby leading to more efficient stimulus processing and improving cognitive control.

Reward Facilitates Response Conflict Resolution Via Global Motor Inhibition: Electromyography Evidence

Neural Dynamics of Reward-Induced Response Activation and Inhibition.

Reward Enhances Backward Inhibition in Task Switching

Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the differential effect of reward prospect on response selection and inhibition

Reward modulates cross-modal conflict

Reward and expectancy effects on neural signals of motor preparation and execution

Reward Expectation Modulates Multiple Stages of Auditory Conflict Control.

Reward Improves Response Inhibition by Enhancing Attentional Capture

Stimulus Feature Conflicts Enhance Motor Inhibitory Control Processes in the Lateral Prefrontal Cortex

Reward Enhances Cross-Modal Conflict Control in Object Categorization: Electrophysiological Evidence

Reward-driven enhancements in motor control are robust to TMS manipulation

Reward Interacts with Modality Shift to Reduce Cross-Modal Conflict.

Chronic academic stress facilitates response inhibition: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence

Volition motivates cognitive performance at the response-execution level by attenuating task-irrelevant motor activations

Neural Correlates of Response Inhibition and Conflict Control on Facial Expressions

Reward Improves Cognitive Control by Enhancing Signal Monitoring

Dissociable influences of reward and punishment on adaptive cognitive control

Reward Modulates Unconsciously Triggered Adaptive Control Processes

Motor demands influence conflict processing in a mouse-tracking Simon task

When Emotional Responses Conflict with Self-Interested Impulses: A Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Study of Cognitive Control in Cooperative Norm Compliance

The influence of reward in the Simon task: Differences and similarities to the Stroop and Eriksen flanker tasks