Abstract:Although the risk difference (RD) is the most common and well explored functional form for testing efficacy with dichotomous endpoint, odds ratio (OR) is also suggested and well applied measure for non-inferiority (NI) trials. Since the construction and interpretation of these function forms are quite different, this study aims to provide detailed discussions and comprehensive comparisons on the design and testing approach for RD and OR scales for the fixed and group sequential three-arm NI trials under various of situations. The sample size determinations and testing approaches for assessing NI of a new treatment in three-arm clinical trials for RD and OR scales were reviewed comprehensively. Simulation studies are conducted for hundreds of scenarios with parameter configurations of the response rates, randomized allocations, NI margins and interim analysis. The operating characteristic (OC) of RD and OR scales based on the MLE and RMLE methods were thoroughly investigated. A trial example was designed and analyzed to demonstrate the methodologies. It is found that sample size determination on OR scale gives smaller sample size and robust procedure compared to RD scale in the majority of situations. When evaluating the behaviors of the attained power, the RMLE methods based on OR scale outperforms the MLE method and tend to have more power to reject the null hypothesis especially under the small sample size situations. Compared to the fixed design, the group sequential design has better OC, which provides a comparable power while needing smaller total average sample sizes for all cases. In addition, we suggest a lower significance level with a higher power for the sample size determination in the superiority test stage in the group sequential design, which can significantly reduce the total sample sizes while the number of subjects in the placebo group does not increase much. It can offer some recommendations for the investigators to choose the optimal endpoints and parameter configurations to design a three-arm NI trial under certain situations.

An IM-based Efficient Test for Non Inferiority of the Odds Ratio Between Two Independent Binomial Proportions

Non-parametric Tests for the Tail Equivalence Via Empirical Likelihood

Unconditional Exact Tests for Equivalence or Noninferiority for Paired Binary Endpoints

Analysis of two Binomial Proportions in Non-inferiority Confirmatory Trials

An efficient asymptotic approach for testing monotone proportions assuming an underlying logit based order dose-response model

An optimal exact confidence interval for the difference of two independent binomial proportions

Tests for equivalence based on odds ratio for matched-pair design

Testing two variances for superiority/non-inferiority and equivalence: Using the exhaustion algorithm for sample size allocation with cost

Wald tests for variance-adjusted equivalence assessment with normal endpoints

A difference-based method for testing no effect in nonparametric regression

A Direct Approach to Simultaneous Tests of Superiority and Noninferiority with Multiple Endpoints

Hypothesis Test to Compare Two Paired Binomial Proportions: Assessment of 24 Methods

Optimization the Design of Fixed and Group Sequential Three-Arm Non-Inferiority Trials with Dichotomous Endpoints of Risk Difference and Odds Ratio

Using non-inferiority test of proportions in design of randomized non-inferiority trials with time-to-event endpoint with a focus on low-event-rate setting

Intrinsic tests for the equality of two correlated proportions

Non-inferiority and networks: inferring efficacy from a web of data

Optimal exact tests for multiple binary endpoints

A two-stage Fisher exact test for multi-arm studies with binary outcome variables

Approximative Tests for the Equality of Two Cumulative Incidence Functions of a Competing Risk

A novel statistical method for comparing effectiveness of two treatments-simulated randomized controlled trials

Robust likelihood ratio tests for composite nulls and alternatives