Establishment of Epidemiological Cut-off Values for Cefoselis, a New Fourth-Generation Cephalosporin, Against Escherichia Coli, Klebsiella Pneumoniae, Enterobacter Cloacae, Proteus Mirabilis and Pseudomonas Aeruginosa.

Xue Li,Peiyao Jia,Ying Zhu,Yingchun Xu,Yunsong Yu,Yuan Lv,Minggui Wang,Ziyong Sun,Jie Lin,Yun Li,Bo Zheng,Fupin Hu,Yan Guo,Zhongju Chen,Haixia Li,Ge Zhang,Jingjia Zhang,Wei Kang,Simeng Duan,Tong Wang,Ran Jing,Qiwen Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkab216
2021-01-01
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Abstract:Objectives: To establish the epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs) for cefoselis against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter cloacae, Proteus mirabilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Methods: We collected 2288 non-repetitive clinical isolates from five laboratories throughout four cities in China. The cefoselis MICs and inhibition zone diameters for all isolates were established using the broth microdilution method and the disc diffusion method following EUCAST guidelines. MIC ECOFFs were determined by visual estimation and ECOFFinder software. Zone diameter ECOFFs were set if a high correlation of MICs and inhibition zone diameters was found by Pearson correlation. Zone diameter ECOFFs were finally determined by the visual estimate method. Results: MICs of cefoselis were distributed from 0.008 to >256mg/L for the four Enterobacterales species and from 0.25 to >256mg/L for P. aeruginosa. MIC ECOFFs were 0.125mg/L for E. coli, K. pneumoniae and P. mirabilis, 0.25mg/L for E. cloacae and 32mg/L for P. aeruginosa. A high correlation of MICs and zone diameters was observed for all Enterobacterales (vertical bar r vertical bar>0.8, P<0.001) and a relatively high correlation was found for P. aeruginosa (vertical bar r vertical bar=0.71, P<0.001). The zone diameter ECOFF was 24mm for E. cloacae, E. coli and K. pneumoniae, 26mm for P. mirabilis and 21mm for P. aeruginosa. Conclusions: We determined MIC and zone diameter ECOFFs for cefoselis against four Enterobacterales species and P. aeruginosa. The establishment of ECOFFs for cefoselis provides clinicians with helpful guidance to differentiate WT and non-WT pathogens.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?