Abstract:Abstract Linking depositional properties and post-depositional diagenetic modifications of a rock with its petrophysical attributes remains a greatest challenge for carbonate rock characterization, formation evaluation and petrophysical rock typing. Generally, characterization of carbonate rock facies is labor intensive which requires an experienced geologist to interpret and integrate core, petrographic thin-sections and borehole image logs. In this approach, the carbonate lithofacies are identified with an emphasis on the diagenetic features, such as grain packing, micritization, cementation and dolomitization as well as diagenetic/karstic dissolution, and related connected or partial connected interparticle pores, intraparticle pores, separate and oversized vugs and micrite micro-porosity, etc. Here, we focused on developing deep learning based technique for automatizing manual facies identification process, a powerful tool to provide consistent and faster turnaround interpretations of geological facies for applications such as petrophysical parameter prediction. In this paper, an architecture for unsupervised multi-class semantic segmentation of carbonate facies that incorporates deep U-Net based architecture is presented. The advantages of using such a network comes from adding skip connections which allows better flow of information in the network. This in return ensures comparable performances along with better feature representation for semantic segmentation tasks. Although many machine learning techniques have been previously applied for facies image analysis automation, the foundation is always the effectiveness of segmentation of multiple overlapping objects in the image. In case of carbonate rocks, diagenesis multiplies the heterogeneity complication. Therefore, in order to deal with this heterogeneity of carbonates we focused on unsupervised approaches because supervised learning methods can become very impractical due to the daunting task of manual feature labeling. Multiple experiments are conducted on representative images of three types of carbonate facies (grainstone, rudstone, and packstone) to evaluate the performance of our segmentation algorithm and provide quantitative metrics useful for geological and petrophysical applications. Additionally, the segmentation algorithm is also used to detect primary resistive features from resistivity based borehole images. The consistent segmentation results have proved both the effectiveness and validity of the algorithm.

Application of Active Learning in Carbonate Lithologic Identification

Evaluation of Active Learning Algorithms for Formation Lithology Identification

Active Domain Adaptation With Application to Intelligent Logging Lithology Identification

ORALI: Open-set recognition and active learning for unknown lithology identification

Cross-Domain Lithology Identification Using Active Learning and Source Reweighting

Integrated Carbonate Lithofacies Modeling Based on the Deep Learning and Seismic Inversion and Its Application

Subsurface Lithofacies Identification with Meta Learning

A Lithology Identification Approach Using Well Logs Data and Convolutional Long Short-Term Memory Networks

Research on lithology identification method based on mechanical specific energy principle and machine learning theory

Lithology Identification by Adaptive Feature Aggregation under Scarce Labels

Partial Domain Adaptation for Building Borehole Lithology Model under Weaker Geological Prior

Lithofacies logging identification for strongly heterogeneous deep-buried reservoirs based on improved Bayesian inversion: The Lower Jurassic sandstone, Central Junggar Basin, China

An automatic identification method of imbalanced lithology based on Deep Forest and K-means SMOTE

Automatic Carbonate Rock Facies Identification with Deep Learning

Semi-supervised Learning for Lithology Identification Using Laplacian Support Vector Machine

An improved lithology identification approach based on representation enhancement by logging feature decomposition, selection and transformation

Intelligent On-Site Lithology Identification Based on Deep Learning of Rock Images and Elemental Data

Seismic Stratigraphic Interpretation Based on Deep Active Learning.

Learning to Label with Active Learning and Reinforcement Learning.

Borehole lithology modelling with scarce labels by deep transductive learning