Abstract:Machine-learning techniques allow geoscientists to extract meaningful information from data in an automated fashion, and they are also an efficient alternative to traditional manual interpretation methods. Many geophysical problems have an abundance of unlabeled data and a paucity of labeled data, and the lithology classification of wireline data reflects this situation. Training supervised algorithms on small labeled data sets can lead to overtraining, and subsequent predictions for the numerous unlabeled data may be unstable. However, semisupervised algorithms are designed for classification problems with limited amounts of labeled data, and they are theoretically able to achieve better accuracies than supervised algorithms in these situations. We explore this hypothesis by applying two semisupervised techniques, label propagation (LP) and self-training, to a well-log data set and compare their performance to three popular supervised algorithms. LP is an established method, but our self-training method is a unique adaptation of existing implementations. The well-log data were made public through an SEG competition held in 2016. We simulate a semisupervised scenario with these data by assuming that only one of the 10 wells has labels (i.e., core samples), and our objective is to predict the labels for the remaining nine wells. We generate results from these data in two stages. The first stage is applying all the algorithms in question to the data as is (i.e., the global data), and the results from this motivate the second stage, which is applying all algorithms to the data when they are decomposed into two separate data sets. Overall, our findings suggest that LP does not outperform the supervised methods, but our self-training method coupled with LP can outperform the supervised methods by a notable margin if the assumptions of LP are met.

Semi-supervised Learning for Lithology Identification Using Laplacian Support Vector Machine

Feature-Depth Smoothness Based Semi-Supervised Weighted Extreme Learning Machine for lithology identification

Borehole lithology modelling with scarce labels by deep transductive learning

Lithology Identification by Adaptive Feature Aggregation under Scarce Labels

Research Status and Prospects of Intelligent Logging Lithology Identification

Conjunction of Active and Semi-Supervised Learning for Wireline Logs-Based Automatic Lithology Identification

Unsupervised Domain Adaptation Using Maximum Mean Discrepancy Optimization for Lithology Identification

Evaluation of Active Learning Algorithms for Formation Lithology Identification

An automatic identification method of imbalanced lithology based on Deep Forest and K-means SMOTE

Sequential data-driven cross-domain lithology identification under logging data distribution discrepancy

Interpretable Semisupervised Classification Method under Multiple Smoothness Assumptions with Application to Lithology Identification.

Cross-Well Lithology Identification Based on Wavelet Transform and Adversarial Learning

A Lithology Identification Approach Using Well Logs Data and Convolutional Long Short-Term Memory Networks

An improved lithology identification approach based on representation enhancement by logging feature decomposition, selection and transformation

Lithology identification using well logs: A method by integrating artificial neural networks and sedimentary patterns

An Improved Method for Lithology Identification Based on a Hidden Markov Model and Random Forests

Improved well-log classification using semisupervised label propagation and self-training, with comparisons to popular supervised algorithms

Cross-well Lithology Identification Based on Dynamic Adversarial Adaptation

A Tri-Training method for lithofacies identification under scarce labeled logging data

Classification with noisy labels through tree-based models and semi-supervised learning: A case study of lithology identification

Lithology Classification Based on Set-Valued Identification Method