Correlation Between Trans-Stenotic Blood Flow Velocity Differences and the Cerebral Venous Pressure Gradient in Transverse Sinus Stenosis: A Prospective 4-Dimensional Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

Heyu Ding,Pengfei Zhao,Han Lv,Xiaoshuai Li,Xiaoyu Qiu,Rong Zeng,Guopeng Wang,Zhenghan Yang,Shusheng Gong,Long Jin,Zhenchang Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyab222
IF: 5.315
2021-01-01
Neurosurgery
Abstract:BACKGROUND: The relationship between trans-stenotic blood flow velocity differences and the cerebral venous pressure gradient (CVPG) in transverse sinus (TS) stenosis (TSS) has not been studied. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the hemodynamic manifestations of TSS and the relationship between trans-stenotic blood flow velocity differences and the CVPG. METHODS: Thirty-three patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) or pulsatile tinnitus (PT) and TSS who had undergone diagnostic venography using venous manometry were included in the patient group. Thirty-three volunteers with no stenosis and symptoms were included in the control group. All the 2 groups underwent prospective venous sinus 4-dimensional (4D) flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The average velocity (V-avg) difference and maximum velocity (V-max) difference between downstream and upstream of the TS in 2 groups were measured and compared. Correlations between the CVPG and trans-stenotic V-avg difference/V-max difference/index of transverse sinus stenosis (ITSS) were assessed in the patient group. RESULTS: The differences in V-avg difference and V-max difference between the patient and control groups showed a statistical significance (P < .001). The V-avg difference and V-max difference had a strong correlation with CVPG (R = 0.675 and 0.701, respectively, P < .001) in the patient group. Multivariate linear regression using the stepwise method showed that the V-max difference and ITSS were correlated with the CVPG (R = 0.752 and R-2 = 0.537, respectively; P < .001). CONCLUSION: The trans-stenotic blood flow velocity difference significantly correlates with the CVPG in TSS. As a noninvasive imaging modality, 4D flow MRI may be a suitable screening or complimentary tool to decide which TSS may benefit from invasive venous manometry.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?