Abstract:Objective: To investigate the feasibility and performance of 4D flow MRI accelerated by compressed sensing (CS) for the hemodynamic quantification of intracranial artery and venous sinus. Materials and methods: Forty healthy volunteers were prospectively recruited, and 20 volunteers underwent 4D flow MRI of cerebral artery, and the remaining volunteers underwent 4D flow MRI of venous sinus. A series of 4D flow MRI was acquired with different acceleration factors (AFs), including sensitivity encoding (SENSE, AF = 4) and CS (AF = CS4, CS6, CS8, and CS10) at a 3.0 T MRI scanner. The hemodynamic parameters, including flow rate, mean velocity, peak velocity, max axial wall shear stress (WSS), average axial WSS, max circumferential WSS, average circumferential WSS, and 3D WSS, were calculated at the internal carotid artery (ICA), transverse sinus (TS), straight sinus (SS), and superior sagittal sinus (SSS). Results: Compared to the SENSE4 scan, for the left ICA C2, mean velocity measured by CS8 and CS10 groups, and 3D WSS measured by CS6, CS8, and CS10 groups were underestimated; for the right ICA C2, mean velocity measured by CS10 group, and 3D WSS measured by CS8 and CS10 groups were underestimated; for the right ICA C4, mean velocity measured by CS10 group, and 3D WSS measured by CS8 and CS10 groups were underestimated; and for the right ICA C7, mean velocity and 3D WSS measured by CS8 and CS10 groups, and average axial WSS measured by CS8 group were also underestimated (all p < 0.05). For the left TS, max axial WSS and 3D WSS measured by CS10 group were significantly underestimated ( p = 0.032 and 0.003). Similarly, for SS, mean velocity, peak velocity, average axial WSS measured by the CS8 and CS10 groups, max axial WSS measured by CS6, CS8, and CS10 groups, and 3D WSS measured by CS10 group were significantly underestimated compared to the SENSE4 scan ( p = 0.000–0.021). The hemodynamic parameters measured by CS4 group had only minimal bias and great limits of agreement compared to conventional 4D flow (SENSE4) in the ICA and every venous sinus (the max/min upper limit to low limit of the 95% limits of agreement = 11.4/0.03 to 0.004/−5.7, 14.4/0.05 to −0.03/−9.0, 12.6/0.04 to −0.03/−9.4, 16.8/0.04 to 0.6/−14.1; the max/min bias = 5.0/−1.2, 3.5/−1.4, 4.5/−1.1, 6.6/−4.0 for CS4, CS6, CS8, and CS10, respectively). Conclusion: CS4 strikes a good balance in 4D flow between flow quantifications and scan time, which could be recommended for routine clinical use.

The hemodynamic assessment in ischemic stroke patients with intracranial artery stenosis by using 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging

Retrospective Study of High Intraarterial Signals on Conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients

Functional Evaluation of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis by Pressure Ratio Measurements

Abstract 174: In-vivo Assessment of the Impact of Regional Intracranial Atherosclerotic Lesions on Brain Arterial 3D Hemodynamics

Association of Stenosis, Proximal Flow and Distal Perfusion in Subjects With Middle Cerebral Artery Stenosis

Permeability Imaging As a Biomarker of Leptomeningeal Collateral Flow in Patients with Intracranial Arterial Stenosis.

Noninvasive Assessment of Cerebral Artery Stenoses from Anatomic Computed Tomography Angiography

Multiparametric flow analysis using four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging can detect cerebral hemodynamic impairment in patients with internal carotid artery stenosis

Hemodynamic assessment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: comparison between invasive non-hyperemic pressure ratio and angiography-derived quantitative flow ratio

Using Flat-Panel Perfusion Imaging to Measure Cerebral Hemodynamics: A Pilot Feasibility Study in Patients With Carotid Stenosis

Status of MRI in Evaluating Hemodynamics in Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis

Hemodynamic Impairments of Evaluating Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis using Quantitative Flow Ratio on Digital Subtraction Angiography

High-Frame Rate Vector Flow Imaging Technique: Initial Application in Evaluating the Hemodynamic Changes of Carotid Stenosis Caused by Atherosclerosis

Association of Fractional Flow on 3D-TOF-MRA with Cerebral Perfusion in Patients with MCA Stenosis.

Decreased flow in ischemic stroke with coexisting intracranial artery stenosis and white matter hyperintensities

Preliminary Study of Cerebral Hemodynamics Evaluation by MR 3D Arterial Spin Labeling for Patients with Unilateral Carotid Stenosis

Observation of intracranial artery and venous sinus hemodynamics using compressed sensing-accelerated 4D flow MRI: performance at different acceleration factors

In-vitro and In-Vivo Assessment of 4D Flow MRI Reynolds Stress Mapping for Pulsatile Blood Flow

Arterial Spin Labeling Magnetic Resonance Imaging Estimation of Antegrade and Collateral Flow in Unilateral Middle Cerebral Artery Stenosis

Optimization of 4D Flow MRI Spatial and Temporal Resolution for Examining Complex Hemodynamics in the Carotid Artery Bifurcation

Cerebral Blood Flow Patterns in Patients With Low‐Flow Carotid Artery Stenosis, a 4D‐PCMRI Assessment