Abstract PO015: The impact of the tumor immune microenvironment on response to pembrolizumab in patients with microsatellite instability-high endometrial cancer

Jeffrey A. How,Minghao Dao,Elizabeth Euscher,Melinda Yates,Weiyi Peng,Shrina D. Patel,Karen H. Lu,Patrick Hwu,Linghua Wang,Amir A. Jazaeri
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.endomet20-po015
IF: 13.801
2021-01-01
Clinical Cancer Research
Abstract:Introduction: Despite FDA approval of pembrolizumab in microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) / mismatch repair deficient solid tumors, approximately half of patients with MSI-H endometrial cancer are treatment-refractory. Our unpublished analysis of MSI-H endometrial cancer samples from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) suggests the possibility of immunologically “hot” and “cold” tumor microenvironments (TME); these differences may explain variable treatment responses. We sought to evaluate MSI-H endometrial tumor samples to examine differences in the TME and identify transcriptomic signatures associated with response/resistance to pembrolizumab. Methods: Archival tumor samples from MSI-H endometrial cancer patients treated at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center were obtained under an IRB-approved protocol. Tissue samples originating from patients who did not receive pembrolizumab treatment (“untreated cohort ”; n = 11) were submitted for RNA sequencing analysis (RNA-seq) to validate the TME heterogeneity observed in MSI-H samples of the TCGA dataset. Pre-treatment archival tumor samples (“treated cohort”; n = 23) from patients who were treated with pembrolizumab were collected and submitted for RNA-seq to identify predictive immuno-genomic signatures associated with treatment response. Results: In the untreated cohort, there were observable differences in the transcriptomic profiles of the samples. Four samples were immunologically “hot” as evidenced by an abundance of pro-inflammatory immune cell infiltrate (CD8+ T-cells, B-cells, monocytes, and dendritic cells). Three samples had a paucity of pro-inflammatory immune cell infiltrate (“cold”) while 4 samples had intermediate amounts (“warm”). In the treated cohort, there were 14 responders, 7 non-responders, and 2 patients with unknown response. The 14 responders consisted of samples with “hot” (5/5; 100%), “cold” (6/8; 75%), and “warm” TMEs (3/8; 37.5%) while the 7 non-responders consisted of only “cold” (2/8; 25%) and “warm” (5/8; 62.5%) TME samples. We observed an enrichment of fibroblasts and endothelial cell transcriptomic signatures in the samples of the non-responders compared to responders (p = 0.018). In particular, there was a significantly higher gene expression of PAMR1, HHIP, and MMRN1 in the non-responders. Subdividing samples into complete response, partial response, and no response to pembrolizumab, we observed a trend of increasing enrichment of fibroblast and endothelial cell transcriptomic signatures as response decreased. Specifically, there was increasing expression of TAGLN (fibroblast gene) and other endothelial cell genes (EMCN, KDR, MMRN1, MYCT1, PEAR1, PTPRB, and TEK). Conclusion: The TME composition appears to be heterogeneous among MSI-H endometrial cancer patients. Increased presence of fibroblasts and endothelial cells in the TME may contribute to innate resistance to pembrolizumab. Treatment aimed toward the reduction of these cellular subpopulations may improve sensitivity to PD-1 inhibitors. Future studies are needed to validate these findings. Citation Format: Jeffrey A. How, Minghao Dao, Elizabeth Euscher, Melinda Yates, Weiyi Peng, Shrina D. Patel, Karen H. Lu, Patrick Hwu, Linghua Wang, Amir A. Jazaeri. The impact of the tumor immune microenvironment on response to pembrolizumab in patients with microsatellite instability-high endometrial cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Special Conference: Endometrial Cancer: New Biology Driving Research and Treatment; 2020 Nov 9-10. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2021;27(3_Suppl):Abstract nr PO015.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?