Abstract:Abstract Background: It is well known that immunological pathways are relevant for response to classical neoadjuvant chemotherapy as well as combined chemo-immunotherapy. In addition, it has been shown that combined chemo-immunotherapy significantly improves survival, even in the context of only moderate effects on pCR. Due to the window therapy with durvalumab-alone and the option to analyze multiple consecutive biopsies, the GeparNuevo trial offers the opportunity to 1) determine gene expression patterns for pCR and DDFS endpoints 2) identify pathways most relevant for pCR and DDFS 3) identify genes specifically regulated by immunotherapy (comparison of samples pre-and post-window) 4) identify genes specifically regulated by chemotherapy (comparison of samples pre-Tx and after 4 cycles of chemotherapy 5) identify longitudinal patterns of gene expression by comparison of up to four time points and 6) identify changes in the tumor microenvironment by spatial sequencing of tumor cell and stroma areas. Methods: 292 tumor samples were evaluated by gene expression analysis: 162 pretherapeutic core biopsies, 79 post-window biopsies, 32 biopsies during chemotherapy and 19 biopsies of the residual tumor after therapy. These samples were analyzed by HTG OBP panel targeting 2549 genes which are assigned to 25 different biological mechanisms or cellular pathways. In addition, spatial profiling was compared in a subset of pre-and post-window samples using Nanostring GeoMx spatial profiling system. Endpoints were pCR and DDFS. Results: A total of more than 600 genes were significantly associated with either the pCR or the DDFS endpoint in either the complete GeparNuevo cohort or one of the two therapy arms. Interestingly, there was a large number of predictive or prognostic genes (n=247 for pCR and n=179 for DDFS) in the durvalumab arm, while the number of genes in the placebo arm was considerably lower (n=113 for pCR and n=61 for DDFS). We used existing pathway information for HTG OBP panel to analyze the contribution of different cellular processes to pCR and DDFS signatures in different therapy arms. Immune pathways were particularly relevant for durvalumab signatures (pCR and DDFS), while cell cycle related gene expression patterns were particularly involved in signatures predictive of pCR in both therapy arms. To further assign genes to the cellular response to durvalumab-alone or chemotherapy-alone, we compared gene expression patterns in durvalumab arm before and after the window phase (gene expression patterns induced by one dose of durvalumab) with gene expression patterns in placebo arm before and after 4 cycles of chemotherapy. Further longitudinal alterations were analyzed by comparison of longitudinal samples for 4 different time-points (a: before NACT, n=162; b: after window phase, n=79; c: after 4 cycles, n=31 and d: at surgery, n=19). Using the Nanostring GeoMx spatial RNA profiling system guided by cytokeratine immunofluorescence, we compared areas with high tumor cell content with stromal areas with or without TILs. In combination with the HTG gene expression data, we were able allocate the changes induced by durvalumab vs chemotherapy to the stromal cell and tumor cell compartment, indicating a re-organization of the tumor-microenvironment. Conclusions: In our analysis, we show that immune gene signatures are particularly relevant for neoadjuvant response to durvalumab as well as prognosis after durvalumab treatment, while proliferation signatures are involved in pCR-signatures after durvalumab as well as chemotherapy. The spatial analysis showed that relevant changes occur in the stromal compartment, indicating a re-organization of the tumor microenvironment. The parallel targeting of immune- and proliferation pathways might explain why a combined immunotherapy-chemotherapy approach is more successful than each single therapy strategy alone. Citation Format: Carsten Denkert, Andreas Schneeweiss, Julia Rey, Akira Hattesohl, Thomas Karn, Michael Braun, Paul Jank, Jens Huober, Hans-Peter Sinn, Dirk-Michael Zahm, Claus Hanusch, Frederik Marmé, Jenny Furlanetto, Jörg Thomalla, Jens-Uwe Blohmer, Marion van Mackelenbergh, Thorsten Stiewe, Peter Staib, Christian Jackisch, Julia Teply-Szymanski, Peter A. Fasching, Bruno V. Sinn, Michael Untch, Karsten Weber, Sibylle Loibl. PD4-02 Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of predictive and prognostic signatures in triple-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant combination immune-chemotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD4-02.

Abstract CT207: Association of gene expression profiles and clinical outcomes in patients with locally advanced or recurrent/metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma treated with pembrolizumab in KEYNOTE-629

Abstract 6413: Biomarkers of response and progression to Pembrolizumab and Vorinostat combination in late-stage squamous cell carcinoma patients of different locations included in the PEVOsq basket trial

360 Tumor-immune Signatures Associated with Response or Resistance to Tislelizumab in Patients with Previously Treated Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)

Abstract CT044: Genomic Correlates of Clinical Benefits from Atezolizumab Combined with Bevacizumab Vs. Atezolizumab Alone in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)

Association Between Biomarkers and Clinical Outcomes of Pembrolizumab Monotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: KEYNOTE-086 Exploratory Analysis

Abstract CT216: Response to first-line (1L) pembrolizumab (pembro) + chemotherapy (chemo) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by blood tumor mutational burden (bTMB): the phase 2 KEYNOTE-782 trial

Abstract CT115: Updated survival results of the KEYNOTE-040 study of pembrolizumab vs standard-of-care chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Abstract 6555: scRNAseq and TCR repertoire analysis identifies immune correlates of response to combined BRAF/MEK/PD1 inhibition in a phase 2 trial

Abstract 2803: Identification of microbiome and predictive immune biomarkers in patients with advanced non-small lung cancer treated with pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy

Abstract 1307: Assessment of gene expression in peripheral blood from patients with advanced melanoma using RNA-seq before and after treatment with anti-PD-1 therapy with pembrolizumab (MK-3475)

Abstract GS1-02: Final results of KEYNOTE-355: Randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study of pembrolizumab + chemotherapy vs placebo + chemotherapy for previously untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer

Abstract 518: Immunogenomic Correlates of Response to Combination Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Advanced Sarcoma

Abstract CT249: Results from KEYMAKER-U01 substudy 3: a phase 2 umbrella study of pembrolizumab plus investigational agents in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with anti-PD-(L)1 therapy

Abstract PD4-02: PD4-02 Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of predictive and prognostic signatures in triple-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant combination immune-chemotherapy

Abstract LB192: MTL-CEBPA in combination with pembrolizumab converts an immune desert to an inflamed TME in solid tumors resistant to checkpoint blockade

Efficacy Of Pembrolizumab (Mk-3475) And Relationship With Pd-L1 Expression In Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Findings From Keynote-001)

Abstract CT253: Results from KEYNOTE-B99: Phase 2 study of first-line (1L) pembrolizumab (pembro) plus investigational agents and chemotherapy (chemo) for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC)

Abstract 3664: Evaluation of on-treatment tumor molecular dynamics using plasma whole genome sequencing (pWGS) and whole exome sequencing (pWES) of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in patients (pts) with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): An exploratory analysis of KEYNOTE-598

Abstract CT256: Results from KEYNOTE-B98: A phase 1b/2 study of pembrolizumab plus investigational agents in patients with anti-PD-(L)1-refractory extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC)

Abstract 6397: Immune profiling for improving responsiveness to ipilimumab plus nivolumab checkpoint blockade treatment in patients with metastatic melanoma