Abstract:LBA9000 Background: EGFR TKIs are standard 1L therapy for metastatic NSCLC with sensitizing EGFR mutations; however, most patients (pts) ultimately experience PD. We report the protocol-specified final analysis (FA) from the randomized, double-blind, phase 3 KEYNOTE-789 study of pemetrexed (pem) and platinum-based chemotherapy (chemo) with or without pembrolizumab (pembro) as subsequent therapy for pts with TKI-resistant, EGFR-mutant, metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC (NCT03515837). Methods: Adults with histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IV nonsquamous NSCLC, ECOG PS of 0 or 1, documented DEL19 or L858R EGFR mutation, and progression after EGFR TKI treatment were enrolled. Pts were randomized 1:1 to 35 cycles of pembro 200 mg Q3W or placebo (pbo) Q3W plus 4 cycles of pem and carboplatin or cisplatin Q3W followed by maintenance pem. Randomization was stratified by PD-L1 TPS (<50% vs ≥50%), prior osimertinib (yes vs no), and region (East Asia vs not East Asia). Dual primary endpoints were PFS per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR) and OS. ORR and DOR per RECIST v1.1 by BICR and safety were secondary endpoints. Final PFS testing was completed at the second interim analysis (IA2; data cutoff, Dec 3, 2021); all other endpoints were assessed at FA (data cutoff, Jan 17, 2023). Efficacy boundaries based on actual observed events were 1-sided P = 0.0117 for PFS (IA2) and P = 0.0118 for OS (FA). Results: 492 pts were randomized to pembro + chemo (n = 245) or pbo + chemo (n = 247). At IA2, median PFS (95% CI) was 5.6 (5.5–5.8) mo with pembro + chemo vs 5.5 (5.4–5.6) mo with pbo + chemo; HR 0.80 (95% CI, 0.65–0.97); P = 0.0122; and the results did not reach statistical significance. Median (range) time from randomization to data cutoff at FA (Jan 17, 2023) was 42.0 (29.5–53.9) mo. At FA, median OS (95% CI) was 15.9 (13.7–18.8) vs 14.7 (12.7–17.1) mo. While the HR for OS (0.84 [95% CI, 0.69–1.02]; P = 0.0362) favored pembro + chemo vs pbo + chemo, it did not reach statistical significance. OS rates at 12-mo were 61.6% vs 59.4% and at 24-mo were 30.6% vs 26.4%. HR for OS was similar in PD-L1 TPS ≥50% (HR, 0.84) and TPS <50% groups (HR, 0.85). ORR (95% CI) in ITT was 29.0% (23.4%–35.1%) with pembro + chemo vs 27.1% (21.7%–33.1%) with pbo + chemo. Median DOR was 6.3 (2.3 to 40.8+) mo vs 5.6 (1.8+ to 40.6+) mo. Grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs occurred in 43.7% of pts in pembro + chemo arm and 38.6% in pbo + chemo arm; grade 5 AEs occurred in 0.4% vs 0.8%. Grade ≥3 immune-mediated AEs and infusion reactions occurred in 4.5% of pts in the pembro + chemo arm and 2.0% in the pbo + chemo arm; 0.4% vs 0% had grade 5 events. Conclusions: In the KEYNOTE-789 study, addition of pembro to chemo in pts with TKI-resistant, EGFR-mutant, metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC did not significantly prolong PFS and OS in comparison to pbo + chemo. AEs were manageable in both arms, and no new safety signals were identified. Clinical trial information: NCT03820986 .

P76.73 MARIPOSA: Randomized Phase 3 Study of First-line Amivantamab + Lazertinib Vs Osimertinib Vs Lazertinib in EGFR-mutant NSCLC

MARIPOSA: Phase 3 Study of First-Line Amivantamab + Lazertinib Versus Osimertinib in EGFR-mutant Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer.

Amivantamab Plus Lazertinib Vs Osimertinib in First-Line EGFR-mutant Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) with Biomarkers of High-Risk Disease: A Secondary Analysis from the Phase 3 MARIPOSA Study.

LBA14 Amivantamab Plus Lazertinib Vs Osimertinib As First-Line Treatment in Patients with EGFR-mutated, Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Primary Results from MARIPOSA, a Phase III, Global, Randomized, Controlled Trial

1258O Amivantamab (JNJ-61186372), an EGFR-MET Bispecific Antibody, in Combination with Lazertinib, a 3Rd-Generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI), in Advanced EGFR NSCLC

P76.74 PAPILLON: Randomized Phase 3 Study of Amivantamab Plus Chemotherapy Vs Chemotherapy Alone in EGFR Exon20ins NSCLC

P15.03 A Phase 1/1b Study of Lazertinib As Monotherapy and in Combination with Amivantamab in Advanced EGFR-Mutated NSCLC

Amivantamab plus lazertinib versus osimertinib in first-line EGFR-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with biomarkers of high-risk disease: a secondary analysis from MARIPOSA

Amivantamab Plus Lazertinib in Previously Untreated EGFR -Mutated Advanced NSCLC

Subcutaneous amivantamab and lazertinib as first-line treatment in patients with EGFR-mutated, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Results from the phase 2 PALOMA-2 study.

LBA10 Amivantamab Plus Lazertinib Vs Osimertinib As First-Line Treatment among Asian Patients with EGFR-mutated, Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): MARIPOSA Subgroup Analysis

Amivantamab plus lazertinib in osimertinib-relapsed EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase 1 trial

A randomized, double-blind, multinational phase III study to assess the efficacy and safety of lazertinib versus gefitinib in the first-line treatment of patients with EGFR mutation (EGFRm), advanced NSCLC (LASER301; NCT04248829)

Subcutaneous Versus Intravenous Amivantamab, Both in Combination with Lazertinib, in Refractory Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Primary Results from the Phase III PALOMA-3 Study.

Pemetrexed and Platinum with or Without Pembrolizumab for Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (Tki)-Resistant, EGFR-mutant, Metastatic Nonsquamous NSCLC: Phase 3 KEYNOTE-789 Study

Subcutaneous versus Intravenous Amivantamab, both in Combination with Lazertinib, in Refractory EGFR-mutated NSCLC: Primary Results from the Phase 3 PALOMA-3 Study

1192MO Amivantamab Monotherapy and in Combination with Lazertinib in Post-Osimertinib EGFR-mutant NSCLC: Analysis from the CHRYSALIS Study

Subcutaneous amivantamab vs intravenous amivantamab, both in combination with lazertinib, in refractory EGFR-mutated, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Primary results, including overall survival (OS), from the global, phase 3, randomized controlled PALOMA-3 trial.

A Phase I-III Platform Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Multiple Therapies in Patients with Biomarker-Defined Locally Advanced, Unresectable Stage III Non–small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).

Phase 1/2 Study of NGM707, an ILT2/ILT4 Dual Antagonist Antibody, in Advanced Solid Tumors: Interim Results from Dose-Escalation.

P3.02b-096 Osimertinib (AZD9291) in Asia-Pacific Patients with T790M Mutation-Positive Advanced NSCLC: Open-Label Phase II Study Results