Subcutaneous Versus Intravenous Amivantamab, Both in Combination with Lazertinib, in Refractory Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Primary Results from the Phase III PALOMA-3 Study.

Natasha B. Leighl,Hiroaki Akamatsu,Sun Min Lim,Ying Cheng,Anna R. Minchom,Melina E. Marmarelis,Rachel E. Sanborn,James Chih-Hsin Yang,Baogang Liu,Thomas John,Bartomeu Massuti,Alexander I. Spira,Se-Hoon Lee,Jialei Wang,Juan Li,Caigang Liu,Silvia Novello,Masashi Kondo,Motohiro Tamiya,Ernesto Korbenfeld,Mor Moskovitz,Ji-Youn Han,Mariam Alexander,Rohit Joshi,Enriqueta Felip,Pei Jye Voon,Pongwut Danchaivijitr,Ping-Chih Hsu,Felipe Jose Silva Melo Cruz,Thomas Wehler,Laurent Greillier,Encarnacao Teixeira,Danny Nguyen,Joshua K. Sabari,Angel Qin,Dariusz Kowalski,Mehmet Ali Nahit Sendur,John Xie,Debopriya Ghosh,Ali Alhadab,Nahor Haddish-Berhane,Pamela L. Clemens,Patricia Lorenzini,Remy B. Verheijen,Mohamed Gamil,Joshua M. Bauml,Mahadi Baig,Antonio Passaro
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.24.01001
IF: 45.3
2024-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:PURPOSEPhase III studies of intravenous amivantamab demonstrated efficacy across epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A subcutaneous formulation could improve tolerability and reduce administration time while maintaining efficacy.PATIENTS AND METHODSPatients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC who progressed after osimertinib and platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive subcutaneous or intravenous amivantamab, both combined with lazertinib. Coprimary pharmacokinetic noninferiority end points were trough concentrations (Ctrough; on cycle-2-day-1 or cycle-4-day-1) and cycle-2 area under the curve (AUCD1-D15). Key secondary end points were objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Overall survival (OS) was a predefined exploratory end point.RESULTSOverall, 418 patients underwent random assignment (subcutaneous group, n = 206; intravenous group, n = 212). Geometric mean ratios of Ctrough for subcutaneous to intravenous amivantamab were 1.15 (90% CI, 1.04 to 1.26) at cycle-2-day-1 and 1.42 (90% CI, 1.27 to 1.61) at cycle-4-day-1; the cycle-2 AUCD1-D15 was 1.03 (90% CI, 0.98 to 1.09). ORR was 30% in the subcutaneous and 33% in the intravenous group; median PFS was 6.1 and 4.3 months, respectively. OS was significantly longer in the subcutaneous versus intravenous group (hazard ratio for death, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.92; nominal P = .02). Fewer patients in the subcutaneous group experienced infusion-related reactions (IRRs; 13% v 66%) and venous thromboembolism (9% v 14%) versus the intravenous group. Median administration time for the first infusion was reduced to 4.8 minutes (range, 0-18) for subcutaneous amivantamab and to 5 hours (range, 0.2-9.9) for intravenous amivantamab. During cycle-1-day-1, 85% and 52% of patients in the subcutaneous and intravenous groups, respectively, considered treatment convenient; the end-of-treatment rates were 85% and 35%, respectively.CONCLUSIONSubcutaneous amivantamab-lazertinib demonstrated noninferiority to intravenous amivantamab-lazertinib, offering a consistent safety profile with reduced IRRs, increased convenience, and prolonged survival. PALOMA-3 shows noninferior PK, efficacy, better safety, and faster administration subcutaneous versus IV amivantamab.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?