Abstract:INTRODUCTION Over the past 30 years, initiatives have been taken throughout the world to seek alternatives to traditional methods for the provision of public services. PPPs, an important tool for government reform, have been increasingly implemented since the 1980s (Gibelman and Demone 1983) and have become popular institutional arrangements for supplementing or replacing traditional supply models of public services. At present, the definition of PPPs remains ambiguous. Some define PPPs in a narrow sense as private investment in public infrastructure, and this has become the focus of most existing research. Others consider PPPs to be a middle way between state and privatization (Leitch and Motion 2003). Savas broadly defined PPPs as any relationship between the public and private sectors, or any arrangement under which the private sector takes up actions traditionally performed by the public sector (Savas 2002: 105). His definition covers almost everything with public and private features, including such arrangements as contract system and joint operation. This paper utilizes a broad definition: PPPs are agreements between the public and non-public sectors, in which the non-public sector participates in public service decision-making, directly or indirectly provides services, and shares risks with the public sector. (1) The division of public service delivery subjects into providers and producers can be traced back to the late 1950s (Musgrave 1959). Later, the multiple service provision model was put forward (Savas 2002: 69). The service provision under administrative orders model was gradually replaced by the provision through market allocation based on competitive contracts model. As a result, the relationship between the public and private sectors was reconstructed. The multiple service provision model required cross-sector partnerships and collaboration and targeted integration between the public and non-public sectors. PPPs then emerged as institutional arrangements to address these issues (Jamali 2004). The strengths of PPPs include reduced input cost, improved operational efficiency, better service quality, risk sharing, and maximum use of existing resources and competition. As an innovative path for public service provision, PPPs can bring about more new resources and competition (Domberger and Jensen 1997, Pongsiri 2002, Bovaird 2004). In PPPs, government is increasingly dependent on the external environment to fulfill its mission of providing public services. Most of this work must be completed by coordinating complex inter-actor relationships. The majority of government employees are not in direct contact with personnel responsible for public service provision. The traditional approach of acting alone features limited impact, but the expertise of the public and non-public sectors can complement and balance each other (Linder 1999). Besides, increased efficiency of individual organizations is not equal to the improved overall service of PPPs (Provan and Milward 1995). This may be due to the other organizations' reduced efficiency, or to the poor coordination of different organizations. Government no longer relies solely on traditional hierarchical authority or itself to provide public services (Rhodes 1996), but more on a variety of collaborations and partnerships to establish a network to achieve the goal of public service provision. It's the establishment of reasonable partnerships that can guarantee the strengths and successes of PPPs. Although Savas included various forms of PPPs in the multiple institutional arrangements for public service provision (Savas 2002: 69-91), he failed to analyze in depth how PPPs should be established. Cooper managed to deepen his research into the quality level in contract management (Cooper 2007: 5), but he ignored that excessive reliance on regulatory management and control, such as special inspection and regulations, might cause confrontations between subjects in the collaborative network, for in this case the principal aimed to find errors, but not to improve partnerships (Goldsmith and Eggers 2004: 106). …

How Do Governments Support the Development of Public Private Partnerships? Measuring and Comparing PPP Governmental Support in 20 European Countries

Explaining the Formation of Public-Private Partnerships in a Cross-Country Context - A Tripod Framework with Ten Critical Factors

Do public-private partnerships (PPPs) promote the sustainable development of infrastructure (SDI)? Evidence from China

Review of studies on the public–private partnerships (PPP) for infrastructure projects

Public–private Partnership As a Driver of Sustainable Development: Toward a Conceptual Framework of Sustainability-Oriented PPP

Examining the State of Public-Private Partnership (PPP) Institutionalization in the United States

Infrastructure and PPP in Italy: The role of regulation

Sustainable Operations: A Systematic Operational Performance Evaluation Framework for Public–Private Partnership Transportation Infrastructure Projects

Government Incentives for Private Sector Involvement in Infrastructure PPP Projects

On the Development of Public-Private Partnerships in Transitional Economies: an Explanatory Framework

PPPs: Inter-Actor Relationships Two Cases of Home-Based Care Services in China

A Global Review of Public Private Partnerships Trends and Challenges for Social Infrastructure

Perceptions on PPP Transportation Project Success Factors in Developing Countries: An Explanatory Sequential Investigation

Performance Evaluation Of Public-Private Partnership In Infrastructure Development In China: An Overview

An Empirical Study on Key Factors Influencing the Performance of Public-Private Partnerships(PPP) in Some Transitional Countries

Public-private partnership (PPP): legal regulation, techniques and practice in the context of industrialization

A Legitimate Form of Governance? Examining Public-Private Partnerships in International Environmental Politics

A Conceptual Framework for Identifying Performance Indicators of PPP Urbanization Projects Based on Sustainability Goals

DEVELOPING A PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK FOR TRANSPORT AND HEALTH SECTOR STAKEHOLDERS IN THE UK AND GHANA

Introducing Public–private Partnerships for Metropolitan Subways in China: What is the Evidence?

Assessing the Effectiveness of Public Private Partnership (PPP) Models in China: A Comparative Study