Quantifying Nitrogen Loss and Water Use Via Regionalization and Multiple‐year Scenario Simulations in the North China Plain

Anna Michalczyk,Kurt Christian Kersebaum,Hans-Peter Dauck,Marco Roelcke,Shan-Chao Yue,Xin-Ping Chen,Fu-Suo Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201900559
2020-01-01
Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science
Abstract:Background: Intensive winter wheat-summer maize (Triticum aestivum L.-Zea mays L.) double-cropping systems in the North China Plain often show high nitrogen (N) losses and water use causing harmful threats to the environment. Methods: Continuous multiple-year simulations (31 years) with the HERMES model were used to spatially quantify N and water losses at county scale in order to identify best-practice management applications. Results: Results show simulated annual long-term N losses for the investigated Quzhou County, Hebei Province of 297 kg N ha(-1) under common farmers practice treatment (FP) and 102 kg N ha(-1) under optimized treatment including model derived N fertilizer recommendation and automated irrigation (OPTai). Total losses by N leaching, volatilization and denitrification were 57% (FP) and 40% (OPTai) of the applied fertilizer N, respectively. Spatial differences in N losses were found due to survey-specific differences of average N inputs among the townships. More than 260 kg N ha(-1) y(-1) of fertilizer input, N losses of 190 kg N ha(-1) y(-1), and around 116 mm y(-1) of irrigation water could be saved on average by optimized treatments compared to farmers practice. Conclusion: On clay loam soil only OPTai could maintain crop yield without drought stress. The optimized treatments had the lowest N inputs and N losses but they did not seem to be able to sustain the organic N pools.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?