Reply to ‘Are the 5-hydroxymethylcytosine-based wd-scores really superior over α-fetoprotein for the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma?’

Jiabin Cai,Zhou Zhang,Chuan He,Wei Zhang,Jia Fan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/GUTJNL-2019-320298
IF: 24.5
2020-01-01
Gut
Abstract:We thank Chen and Lin for their interest in our article.1 They raised concerns about the comparison between α-fetoprotein (AFP) and the 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC)-based weighted diagnostic (wd)-scores,2 a debate worth further clarification.\n\nFirst, it should be clarified that Chen and Lin’s description did not represent the overall picture of the wd-scores.1 The performance measures mentioned by Chen and Lin were specifically for distinguishing early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and non-HCC (including not just chronic hepatitis B (CHB) virus infection but also benign liver lesions, liver cirrhosis (LC) and healthy controls) in the validation set. Notably, the 5hmC-based wd-scores consistently outperformed AFP in both training and validation sets for HCC versus non-HCC, early HCC versus CHB/LC, and early HCC versus controls (healthy individuals, benign liver lesions). Compared with AFP alone, the 5hmC-based wd-scores performed especially well when detecting early …
What problem does this paper attempt to address?