Comparison Between ACR CEUS LI-RADS and WFUMB-EFSUMB for Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma in High-Risk Patients

徐琛,黄品同,陈继繁,张超,潘敏强

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2022.09.017

2022-01-01

Abstract:Objective:To compare the diagnostic value of the American College of Radiology contrast-enhanced ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system (ACR CEUS LI-RADS) and the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology-European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB-EFSUMB) guidelines for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in high-risk patients.Methods:From March 2018 to December 2020, 319 patients (334 lesions) with a high risk of HCC at the Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine were analyzed. CEUS videos of 334 lesions were interpreted according to the CEUS LI-RADS 2017 edition and WFUMB-EFSUMB classification criteria. Using surgery or biopsy histopathology, clinical diagnosis, and follow-up results as reference standards, the diagnostic efficacy of each classification of ACR CEUS LI-RADS for HCC was analyzed. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the ROC curve of ACR CEUS LI-RADS LR-5 and WFUMB-EFSUMB criteria in the diagnosis of HCC were calculated and compared by the chi-square test and DeLong's test. The area under the ROC curve of the combined diagnosis was also calculated and compared with that of either of them.Results:Of the 334 liver lesions included, according to the ACR CEUS LI-RADS classification, there were 114 nodules in LR-5 category, 25 in LR-4, 12 in LR-3, and 162 in LR-M; their positive predictive values for the diagnosis of HCC were 93.9%, 40.0%, 16.7%, and 24.7%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of ACR CEUS LI-RADS LR-5 and WFUMB-EFSUMB in the diagnosis of HCC were 66.9% vs 83.8% and 96.0% vs 73.0%, respectively, and the differences were statistically significant (χ2=25.037 and 38.025; P＜0.001). There was no significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy of the two criteria (82.0% vs 78.1%, χ2=1.352, P=0.245). The areas under the ROC curve were 0.814 and 0.784, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.161). The area under the ROC curve of the combined diagnosis of the two was 0.857, which was significantly higher than that of either of them (P=0.001 and <0.001, respectively).Conclusion:Both ACR CEUS LI-RADS and WFUMB-EFSUMB criteria have high diagnostic value for HCC in high-risk patients. The diagnostic efficacy of ACR CEUS LI-RADS LR-5 and WFUMB-EFSUMB is similar. However, the information provided by the two criteria is different, with ACR CEUS LI-RADS LR-5 having a higher specificity and WFUMB-EFSUMB having a higher sensitivity. The two criteria can complement each other to a certain extent.