Effects of different tillage and residue management systems on soil organic carbon stock and grain yield of rice–wheat double cropping system
Naeem Ahmad,Ahmad Latif Virk,Muhammad Bilal Hafeez,Sezai Ercisli,Kirill S. Golokhvast,Yu Qi,Xingyu Guo,Yuanhong Zhang,Rui Wang,Xiaoli Wang,Muhammad Ishaq Asif Rehmani,Jun Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111452
IF: 6.9
2023-12-23
Ecological Indicators
Abstract:Of late, intensive agricultural practices are often associated with many negative implications for soil systems, such as decline in soil organic matter and biological diversity, and increase in the risk of soil erosion, and degradation of soil physical quality. However, conservation agriculture (CA) offers minimum soil disturbance, improving and creating more efficient use of natural resources, enhancing use efficiency of external inputs and increasing soil functioning, organic matter content, and biodiversity. However, CA practices need to be redefined at the specific field level or growing conditions to promote sustainable production system without deteriorating soil health, and to manage profitability. Therefore, a fixed-site field experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of different tillage and residue management practices; CT0 (puddled transplanted rice followed by conventional tilled wheat sown with residue removal); CTR (puddled transplanted rice followed by conventional tilled wheat sown with residue retention); NT0 (direct seeded rice followed by zero-tilled wheat sown with residue removal); NTR (direct seeded rice followed by zero-tilled wheat sown with residue retention) on soil organic carbon (SOC) stock and grain yield of rice–wheat double cropping system. The results showed that the mean SOC stock increased by 31%, 21.9% and 15.3% and by 35.2%, 22% and 17% under NTR, CTR, and NT0 compared with CT0. Furthermore, the SOC sequestration rate in NTR was significantly higher than other treatments. Particulate organic carbon (POC) concentration was 58.4% higher in 0–15 cm than 15–30 cm soil layer, and the maximum concentration was recorded under NTR and minimum was under CT0. The highest average rice grain yield was recorded under CTR, which was 5.5%, 16.2% and 24.3% higher than CT0, NTR and NT0, respectively. Both NTR and CTR produced more average wheat yield, which was 8.4% and 8.5% higher than CT0 and NT0, respectively. Principal component analysis (PCA) also showed that cumulative cropping system yield and SOC were increased under CTR, NTR as compared to other treatments. Therefore, it can be drawn that residue retention could be a useful management practice to increase SOC stock and grain yield under both tillage practices in the rice–wheat cropping system.
environmental sciences