Trade‐off between soil carbon sequestration and net ecosystem economic benefits for paddy fields under long‐term application of biochar

Zhuoxi Chen,Shuo Han,Zhijie Dong,Hongbo Li,Aiping Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.13116

2023-12-19

GCB Bioenergy

Abstract:The use of biochar increased greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions but countered the harm caused by GHG emissions by considerable soil carbon sequestration resulting in a negative carbon footprint. Furthermore, the use of biochar lowered the proportion of CH4 and N2O, demonstrating that biochar usage has a considerable positive effect on GHG emissions. The application of biochar and nitrogen fertilizer can increase rice yield, soil organic carbon (SOC) storage and reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, few studies have systematically evaluated the carbon footprint (CF) and net ecosystem economic benefits (NEEB) of paddy ecosystems under long‐term application of biochar and nitrogen fertilizer. Here, the life cycle assessment method was used to quantify the CF and NEEB of paddy fields under different biochar and nitrogen fertilizer application rates in 7 years. Three biochar rates of 0 (B0), 4.5 (B1) and 13.5 t ha−1 year−1 (B2) and two nitrogen fertilizer rates of 0 (N0) and 300 kg ha−1 year−1 (N) were set. The results showed that B2 significantly increased methane (CH4) emission by 38%, decreased nitrous oxide (N2O) emission by 29%, and significantly increased global warming potential by 27% compared with B0. Besides that, biochar application significantly increased ΔCSOC by 87%–173% and reduced CF by 1.6–1.8 Mg CO2 eq ha−1. Among them, CH4 and N2O emissions contributed 46%–95% of total GHG emissions, and the production and transportation of nitrogen fertilizer and biochar contributed 17%–52% of total GHG emissions. Nitrogen fertilizer application can significantly increase rice yield by 85% compared to the N0, which could bring the largest NEEB. Biochar application had a negative influence on the NEEB regardless of N application. This might be attributable to the fact that the economic gains from increased rice production and SOC caused by biochar cannot outweigh the high cost of biochar. These results suggest that the biochar application can significantly improve the SOC sequestration and reduce the CF, but also had negative effect on NEEB in paddy filed. 摘要 施用生物炭和氮肥能够提高水稻产量、SOC储量、减少温室气体排放量。然而, 很少有研究同时评估长期施用生物炭和氮肥下的稻田生态系统的碳足迹(CF)和净经济系统经济效益(NEEB)。本研究中, 通过生命周期评价法(LCA)量化七年间不同生物炭和氮肥施用量下的稻田碳足迹及其净生态系统经济效益。设置三种生物炭用量0(B0)、4.5(B1)和13.5 t ha−1 year−1(B2)和两个氮肥用量0(N0)和300 kg ha−1 year−1 (N1)。结果表明, 与B0处理相比, B2处理使CH4排放量显著增加38%, N2O排放量降低29%, 总体上GWP显著增加27%。与B0处理相比, 施用生物炭可以使ΔCSOC显著增加87%–173%, 使CF显著降低1.6–1.8 Mg CO2 eq ha−1。其中, CH4和N2O排放量贡献了总温室气体排放量的46%–95%, 氮肥和生物炭的生产及运输贡献了总温室气体排放量的18%–52%。与N0相比, 施氮肥可显著提高水稻产量85%, 且NEEB最大。相比之下, 施用生物炭使NEEB降低, 这可能是由于无论氮肥施用量如何, 生物炭提高水稻产量和SOC的经济效益并不能抵消生物炭的高成本。这些结果表明, 施用生物炭可以显著提高稻田SOC固持, 降低CF, 但对NEEB也有一定的负面影响。

energy & fuels,agronomy