Abstract:Deep neural networks (DNNs) have achieved state-of-the-art performance in various learning tasks, such as computer vision, natural language processing, and speech recognition. However, the fundamental theory of generalization still remains obscure in deep learning-why DNN models can generalize well, despite that they are heavily overparametrized in both depth and width? Recently, some work shows that traditional theory of analyzing the generalization error of learning models fails to explain the generalization of DNNs. The failure is mainly because of one simple fact that the worse case analysis of generalization error for learning models would be too loose for models with large parameter space, such as DNNs. In this work, we propose a new analysis of generalization in DNNs from an optimal transport perspective. Unlike traditional worse-case uniform convergence analysis in learning theory, our analysis of generalization error is dependent on both the learning algorithm and the data distribution and is the average-case analysis. Thus, our theory can be more practical and accurate to describe the generalization behavior of DNNs. More specifically, in this article, we try to answer a fundamental yet unsolved question in deep learning-why deeper models can generalize well than shallow models? The main contribution of this article can be summarized in four aspects. First, under a general learning framework, we derive upper bounds on the generalization error of learning algorithms by their algorithmic transport cost: the expected Wasserstein distance between the output hypothesis and the output hypothesis conditioned on an input example. We further provide several upper bounds on the algorithmic transport cost in terms of total variation distance, relative entropy, and Vapnik-Chervonenkis (VC) dimension. Moreover, we also study different conditions for loss functions under which the generalization error of a learning algorithm can be upper bounded by different probability metrics between distributions relating to the output hypothesis and/or the input data. Finally, under our established framework, we obtain our main results, showing that the generalization error in DNNs decreases exponentially to zero as the number of layers increases.

Analyzing and Quantifying Generalization in Convolutional Neural Networks

Quantitative Analysis of Generalization Ability of Neural Network with Prior-Knowledge

Quantitative Effectiveness Assessment and Role Categorization of Individual Units in Convolutional Neural Networks

Understanding Generalization in Deep Learning via Tensor Methods

Estimating the Generalization in Deep Neural Networks via Sparsity

Characterization and Design of Generalized Convolutional Neural Network

Disentangling Trainability and Generalization in Deep Neural Networks

Towards Understanding Generalization of Graph Neural Networks.

An Optimal Transport Analysis on Generalization in Deep Learning

A separability-based approach to quantifying generalization: which layer is best?

Visualizing and Analyzing Convolution Neural Networks with Gradient Information

Towards Understanding the Generalization of Graph Neural Networks.

QGen: On the Ability to Generalize in Quantization Aware Training

Learning Generalizable Models via Disentangling Spurious and Enhancing Potential Correlations

Evaluating Generalization Ability of Convolutional Neural Networks and Capsule Networks for Image Classification via Top-2 Classification

Generalizing the Convolution Operator in Convolutional Neural Networks

Information-Theoretic Generalization Bounds for Deep Neural Networks

A practical generalization metric for deep networks benchmarking

The Role of Typicality in Object Classification: Improving The Generalization Capacity of Convolutional Neural Networks

Generalization in Neural Networks: A Broad Survey

Understanding Generalization in Recurrent Neural Networks.