Abstract:Deep neural networks (DNNs) have achieved state-of-the-art performance in various learning tasks, such as computer vision, natural language processing, and speech recognition. However, the fundamental theory of generalization still remains obscure in deep learning-why DNN models can generalize well, despite that they are heavily overparametrized in both depth and width? Recently, some work shows that traditional theory of analyzing the generalization error of learning models fails to explain the generalization of DNNs. The failure is mainly because of one simple fact that the worse case analysis of generalization error for learning models would be too loose for models with large parameter space, such as DNNs. In this work, we propose a new analysis of generalization in DNNs from an optimal transport perspective. Unlike traditional worse-case uniform convergence analysis in learning theory, our analysis of generalization error is dependent on both the learning algorithm and the data distribution and is the average-case analysis. Thus, our theory can be more practical and accurate to describe the generalization behavior of DNNs. More specifically, in this article, we try to answer a fundamental yet unsolved question in deep learning-why deeper models can generalize well than shallow models? The main contribution of this article can be summarized in four aspects. First, under a general learning framework, we derive upper bounds on the generalization error of learning algorithms by their algorithmic transport cost: the expected Wasserstein distance between the output hypothesis and the output hypothesis conditioned on an input example. We further provide several upper bounds on the algorithmic transport cost in terms of total variation distance, relative entropy, and Vapnik-Chervonenkis (VC) dimension. Moreover, we also study different conditions for loss functions under which the generalization error of a learning algorithm can be upper bounded by different probability metrics between distributions relating to the output hypothesis and/or the input data. Finally, under our established framework, we obtain our main results, showing that the generalization error in DNNs decreases exponentially to zero as the number of layers increases.

Quantitative Analysis of Generalization Ability of Neural Network with Prior-Knowledge

Study on Evaluation Ways of Feed-Forward Neural Networks Generalization Ability

Research on the Generalization Problem of BP Neural Network

Investigation on Improving Generalization of Neural Network

Sparsity-aware generalization theory for deep neural networks

Generalization in Graph Neural Networks: Improved PAC-Bayesian Bounds on Graph Diffusion

A priori estimates of the generalization error for two-layer neural networks

The Analysis and Improvement of Artificial Neural Network Models

Review on generalization problem of artificial neural network

Analyzing and Quantifying Generalization in Convolutional Neural Networks

Generalization theory and generalization methods for neural networks

Generalization in Neural Networks: A Broad Survey

Understanding Generalization in Deep Learning via Tensor Methods

Strong Generalization in Quantum Neural Networks

Information-Theoretic Generalization Bounds for Deep Neural Networks

Generalization Error Analysis of Neural networks with Gradient Based Regularization

An Optimal Transport Analysis on Generalization in Deep Learning

PAC-Bayesian Generalization Bounds for Knowledge Graph Representation Learning

Generalization Error of Graph Neural Networks in the Mean-field Regime

Covered Forest: Fine-grained generalization analysis of graph neural networks

Study on Estimating Quantum Discord by Neural Network with Prior Knowledge