On the Growth of Meromorphic Solutions of Certain Nonlinear Difference Equations

Li Xiao-Min,Hao Chen-Shuang,Yi Hong-Xun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00009-020-01696-z
2021-01-01
Mediterranean Journal of Mathematics
Abstract:By Cartan’s version of Nevanlinna’s theory, we prove the following result: let m and n be two positive integers satisfying $$n\ge 2+m,$$ let $$p\not \equiv 0$$ be a polynomial, let $$\eta \ne 0$$ be a finite complex number, let $$\omega _{1}, \omega _{2}, \ldots , \omega _{m}$$ be m distinct finite nonzero complex numbers, and let $$H_{j}$$ be either exponential polynomials of degree less than q,  or an ordinary polynomial in z for $$0\le j\le m$$ , such that $$H_{j}\not \equiv 0$$ for $$1\le j\le m.$$ Suppose that $$f\not \equiv \infty $$ is a meromorphic solution of the difference equation: $$\begin{aligned} f^n(z)+p(z)f(z+\eta )&=H_0(z)+H_1(z)e^{\omega _{1}z^{q}}+H_2(z)e^{\omega _{2}z^{q}}\\&\quad +\cdots +H_m(z)e^{\omega _{m}z^{q}}, \end{aligned}$$ such that the hyper-order of f satisfies $$\rho _2(f)<1.$$ Then, f reduces to a transcendental entire function, such that either $$n=m+2$$ with $$H_0\not \equiv 0$$ and $$\lambda (f)=\rho (f)=q,$$ or $$m=2,$$ $$H_0=0$$ and: $$\begin{aligned} f(z)=\frac{H_1(z-\eta )e^{\omega _{1}(z-\eta )^{q}}}{p(z-\eta )} \end{aligned}$$ with $$\begin{aligned} H^n_1(z)=p^n(z)H_2(z+\eta )e^{\omega _2P_{q-1}(z)}\quad \text {and}\quad P_{q-1}(z)=\sum \limits _{k=1}^q\left( {\begin{array}{c}q\\ k\end{array}}\right) \eta ^kz^{q-k}. \end{aligned}$$ This result improves Theorems 1.1 and 1.3 from [19] by removing some assumptions of theirs. An example is provided to show that some results obtained in this paper, in a sense, are the best possible.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?