Dynamic Study of Presuppositions in Language
HUANG Hua-xin,XU Yi-zhong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.2007.05.007
2007-01-01
Abstract:The research on presupposition in logics and linguistics has seen the changes in perspectives from truth conditions to felicity, then to a dynamic point of view. Traditionally, presupposition is studied mainly from its true or false conditions. This is truth condition analysis. However, Allwood explicitly voiced the uncertainty that such an analysis can be used to deal with the natural language. Because in natural language there also exists ″#″ proposition which is neither true nor false. In order to deal with such cases, the felicity analysis of the presupposition was suggested, which regards the presupposition as the felicitous conditions related to the corresponding context. In fact, the pragmatic analysis on presupposition must take the following three perspectives into consideration, which are the speaker, the hearer, and the communication process itself. This new method can be called the dynamic analysis of the presupposition.Different arguments over presupposition studies result from the lack of a dynamic perspective on the phenomenon. The presupposition has often been viewed as the mutual background knowledge or the non-controversial information. As a matter of fact, it is also capable of transmitting new information in the communication if a dynamic perspective is adopted in the study. Through a dynamic analysis there are two kinds of presuppositions. One is the basic common knowledge shared by both the speaker and hearer, while the other is the speaker's intention which the hearer can infer from the assertion and usually the new information. To put it simply, the former is called conventional presupposition and the latter intentional presupposition.Generally speaking, the presupposition shares the characteristics of felicity, common ground, the covertness and defeasibility. However these features are often discussed without even considering the speaker, the hearer or the communication process. Besides these familiar features, the presupposition has some new features such as vagueness, mobility, and hierarchy if observed dynamically.In conclusion, the constituent parts of presupposition are heterogeneous. It can pass on new information and can be classified into two categories: conventional presupposition and intentional ones.