Abstract:Recipients often reject unfair offers at the cost of their own interests in ultimatum games (UGs), reflecting their fairness preference. Yet fairness preference is not invariable. It is affected by various factors, among which empathy plays an important role. Individuals might, for example, sacrifice own interests to help others in need. This kind of behavior not only is contrary to the pursuit of self-interest maximization but also violates fairness principles. As individuals are not only concerned about fairness but also care for others, this study focuses on managing the relationship between the two potentially conflicting goals. We explored individuals’ behaviors and time dynamic processes of brain activities when fairness conflicted with empathy. It was hypothesized that empathy could modulate fairness-related decision making behaviors and ERPs. Thirty-seven college students (26 females, 21.00 ± 2.07 years) participated in this study and completed multiple ultimatum games. EEG signals were recorded during play. In the task, the proposers were underprivileged students (empathy condition) and ordinary children (non-empathy condition). Each proposer distributed 10 yuan between themself and one recipient. The participants played as recipients who would choose to accept or reject distribution offers (fair, disadvantageous unfair, advantageous unfair) by the proposers. The proposers and recipients would get the assigned money only if participants accepted the distribution offers. They received nothing if participants rejected the offer. The behavioral results showed that the acceptance rate in the empathy condition was greater than that in the non-empathy condition for the disadvantageous unfair condition, while the opposite result occurred in the advantageous unfair condition. The EEG results showed that in the non-empathy condition, the advantageous unfair offer induced more negative anterior N1 (AN1) than it did in the empathy condition, but there was no difference between the disadvantageous unfair versus fair conditions. In the advantageous unfair condition, the P2 amplitude of the

Fairness preferences in the Ultimate Game: A dual-system theory perspective

The Neurocomputational Mechanism Underlying Decision-Making on Unfairness to Self and Others

Inequality Aversion or Reciprocity?——An Investigation of Two Kinds of Fairness in the Ultimatum Game

The Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Perception of Unfairness and Related Decision-Making Process

"Fairness preference" in fairness and efficiency:Information and memory effect

Cognitive process underlying ultimatum game: An eye-tracking study from a dual-system perspective

Neural Responses to Unfairness and Fairness Depend on Self-Contribution to the Income.

Developmental patterns and computational mechanisms of school-aged children's fairness-related decision making under social comparison

Social comparisons differentially affect fair and unfair processing in ultimatum bargaining

Neural Signatures of Fairness‐related Normative Decision Making in the Ultimatum Game: A Coordinate‐based Meta‐analysis

Whether others were treated equally affects neural responses to unfairness in the Ultimatum Game.

The Analysis of Development and Explanatory of Fairness Preference Models

Influence of Empathic Concern on Fairness-Related Decision Making: Evidence from ERP

How is the AI Perceived when It Behaves (Un)fairly?

Social Comparison Affects Brain Responses to Fairness in Asset Division: an ERP Study with the Ultimatum Game.

Proposer's moral identity modulates fairness processing in the ultimatum game: Evidence from behavior and brain potentials

Fairness decision-making of opportunity equity in gain and loss contexts

Fairness As A Constraint

Gender Differences in Behavioral and Neural Responses to Unfairness Under Social Pressure

Social preferences across different populations: Meta-analyses on the ultimatum game and dictator game

Decoding fairness: a reinforcement learning perspective